| ²é¿´: 1193 | »Ø¸´: 13 | ||||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | ||||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||||
yyy981014гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÊÕµ½Í¶¸åµÄ¾Ü¾øÐÅ£¬¸÷λ´óϺÃÇÄÜ·ñ°ïСµÜ¿´¿´£¬ÊÇ·ñ»¹ÓÐÖØÍ¶´ËÔÓÖ¾µÄÒâÒ壡
|
|||
|
×òÌìÊÕµ½±à¼µÄ¾Ü¸åÐÅ£¬¾ßÌåÄÚÈÝÈçÏ£º I very much regret to have to tell you that publication in our journal is not recommended. An explanation for this decision is given in the editor report below (and on http://ees.elsevier.com/wr/). I hope that the comments contained therein will be of use to you. Thank you for your interest in our journal. Kind regards, For the Editor, *****, Journal Manager ***** ........................................................... COMMENTS FROM THE EDITOR Overall this paper is too much a case study. The technology is well known and no general new knowledge is obtained. The observation on changed BOD/COD after hydrolysation stage is interesting but would need a much more in depth study to be acceptable as a central point in a ***** paper. Journals as **** might b e better suited for such a type of paper. ÎÒÀϰ忴µ½Õâ·âÐźó¾ö¶¨½«ÎÒÊÖÉÏËùÓÐÊý¾ÝÈ«²¿Ð´ÉÏ£¬È»ºó¼ÌÐøÍ¶ÕâÆªÔÓÖ¾¡£ÓÉÓÚ´ËÔÓÖ¾ÔÚ»·¾³ÒµÄÚÅÅÃû¿¿Ç°£¬±¾ÈËÓеãÐÄÐéÁË£¬ÄÇλ´óϺÄܰïÖúСµÜ·ÖÎöһϣ¬¿´¿´ÎÒ²¹³äÊý¾Ý¼ÌÐøÖØÐÂͶµÄÒâÒåÓжà´ó£¿Ð»Ð»~~ ps£ºÌýËÞÉáÒ»¸çÃÇ˵£¬±»¾ÜºóºÜ¿ìÖØÐÂͶµÄ»°£¬¼¸ºõ¶¼ÊǼÌÐø±»¾Ü£¬¶øÇҺܿ챻¾Ü£¬²»ÖªÊÇ·ñÊÇÕâÑù°¡£¿ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁϸ´ÊÔÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ24È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏÏà¹Ø×¨Òµ344Çóµ÷¼ÁË«·Ç¹¤¿ÆÑ§Ð£»ò¿ÎÌâ×é
ÒѾÓÐ14È˻ظ´
327Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
288Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÄÏÀí¹¤´óѧ071005
ÒѾÓÐ20È˻ظ´
ÓÐûÓÐѧУ²ÄÁÏרҵÊÕ¿çµ÷(Ò»Ö¾Ô¸085410)
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
¸÷λÀÏʦºÃ£¬Çóµ÷¼Á£¬±¾¿Æ211£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ìì½ò´óѧÉúÎïÓëҽҩѧ˶£¬²îÁ½Ãû¼ȡ¡£
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶294·Ö£¬Çóµ¼Ê¦ÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
271Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ34È˻ظ´
297Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì281»¹Óе÷¼Á»ú»áÂð
ÒѾÓÐ33È˻ظ´
bjutyjw
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 2314.2
- É¢½ð: 62
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 155
- ÔÚÏß: 60.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 706784
- ×¢²á: 2009-02-23
- רҵ: ƫ΢·Ö·½³Ì
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| ÎÒµÄÎÄÕ±ʼÇÑûÇëÁËÆß¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬Ç°ÃæµÄÎå¸ö¶¼²»ÄÜÉó£¬ÏÖÔÚµÄÁ½¸öÒ²²»ÖªÄÜ·ñÉ󣬼«¶ÈÓôÃÆ |
4Â¥2009-08-26 07:08:59
yyy981014
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 73.4
- É¢½ð: 50
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 115
- ÔÚÏß: 81Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 175536
- ×¢²á: 2006-01-24
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÎÛȾ¿ØÖÆ»¯Ñ§
2Â¥2009-08-26 03:25:24
nono2009
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
No gains, no pains.
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 28684 (Ժʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 513.911
- ½ð±Ò: 2555230
- É¢½ð: 27828
- ºì»¨: 2148
- ɳ·¢: 66666
- Ìû×Ó: 1602255
- ÔÚÏß: 65200.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 827383
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑмҳﱸίԱ»á
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| The point is "The technology is well known and no general new knowledge is obtained. ". Therefore, I suggest you not to resubmit to the same journal. |
3Â¥2009-08-26 06:59:52
pumaqwe
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 483.5
- Ìû×Ó: 120
- ÔÚÏß: 3.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 824230
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-08
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
| ²»ÒªÔÚͶÕâ¸ö¿¯ÎïÁË,Ö÷±àÁ¬¿¼ÂǶ¼²»»á¿¼ÂǾÍÖ±½Ó¾ÜÁË.ÀË·Ñʱ¼ä. |
6Â¥2009-08-26 07:17:39














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
20