| 查看: 849 | 回复: 16 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
帮忙看一下审稿意见
|
|||
|
这是一个理论模型的工作，主要是数值模拟。投的是biophysical journal 第一个审稿人给了正面评价。而编辑说看过文章了，告诉我文章是acceptable，只要回答reviewers的问题。最后结果是小修。 但要命的是第二个审稿人 该审稿人前面未对本文有任何评价。只是简单陈述了我的文章做了什么事情。 最后一段： The main weakness of this manuscript is that it does not provide a clear basis for accepting or rejecting the proposed model or other recent models for the clock. It would strengthen the manuscript to describe whether there are any experimental observations that are explained by this model and not by other models, or vice versa. It would help to know whether some models perform better in predicting the perturbations to clock output from genetic experiments, such as mutations, over-expression, or reduced expression of clock proteins. If the existing body of data is equally well explained by all competing models, is there a new experiment that could definitively select one of the models? Although it is not necessary for such an experiment to be included in the manuscript, it seems important to describe a feasible experiment of this type. 大家帮忙看看，到底怎么改改？ [ Last edited by biomystery on 2009-8-25 at 07:37 ] |
回复此楼
hubeiww
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1646.2
- 散金: 2199
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 1770
- 在线: 304.4小时
- 虫号: 600554
- 注册: 2008-09-12
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 半导体材料
6楼2009-08-25 07:52:28
pitlord999
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1447.3
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 284
- 在线: 24.4小时
- 虫号: 822142
- 注册: 2009-08-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
2楼2009-08-24 23:19:28
liujunhero
新虫 (文学泰斗)
- 应助: 496 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 1.109
- 金币: 216791
- 散金: 2000
- 红花: 244
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 92937
- 在线: 1579小时
- 虫号: 480354
- 注册: 2007-12-15
- 专业: 食品科学
3楼2009-08-25 06:58:00
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
4楼2009-08-25 07:08:00
