| 查看: 616 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
guohaodong1999金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
journal of biomedical materials reseach 的审稿标准,供参考
|
||
|
Instructions Please provide an editorial review that evaluates the scientific contribution made by the investigator. An acceptable paper should ask questions and provide some answers to significant problems related to the scope of the journal. Please give explicit judgmentin this regard. Also, please suggest modifications, if revision of the manuscript is recommended, and provide specific criticisms that will be helpgul to the authors when revising the manuscript. PRIORITY FOR PUBLICATION Top High Publish if space available Low Do not publish Questionnaire: 1. Does the manuscript contain new and significant information to justify publication? 2. Is the problem significant and concisely stated? 3. Are the experimental and/or theoretical methods described comprehensively? 4. Are the interpretations and conclusions justified by the results? 5. Is the abstract concise? 6. Is the language acceptable? Paper Size is: Adequate Too Long Too Short Tables and Figures are: Adequate Too Many Need More Recommendation Accept As Submitted Accept After Minor Revision (without Re-review) Revise And Reevaluate After Major Revision (with Re-review) Reject - Not Appropriate For Journal Reject - Insufficient New Information Reject - Scientifically Not Sound Would you be willing to review a revision of this manuscript? Comments Confidential Comments to Assistant Editor Comments to the Author |
» 猜你喜欢
今年的WR进展到哪一步了?
已经有8人回复
时间戳他又来了
已经有17人回复
系统今天又提示维护了,估计离放榜不远了
已经有9人回复
产物和副产物价值比较
已经有4人回复
这个自发加氧反应的机理是什么?
已经有7人回复
J-J-W不为人知的一面
已经有19人回复
没消息就是被刷了呗
已经有14人回复
微信指数没变化,科研之友没阅读
已经有8人回复
这种情况还有戏吗
已经有11人回复
同事接到电话了,我却没有
已经有4人回复
hfut1879
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 35473.7
- 散金: 2528
- 红花: 15
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 19179
- 在线: 1542.1小时
- 虫号: 573939
- 注册: 2008-06-15
- 专业: 金属功能材料
2楼2009-08-24 19:05:05
3楼2010-03-08 18:47:40
4楼2010-03-08 22:59:02











回复此楼