| 查看: 538 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
guohaodong1999金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
journal of biomedical materials reseach 的审稿标准,供参考
|
||
|
Instructions Please provide an editorial review that evaluates the scientific contribution made by the investigator. An acceptable paper should ask questions and provide some answers to significant problems related to the scope of the journal. Please give explicit judgmentin this regard. Also, please suggest modifications, if revision of the manuscript is recommended, and provide specific criticisms that will be helpgul to the authors when revising the manuscript. PRIORITY FOR PUBLICATION Top High Publish if space available Low Do not publish Questionnaire: 1. Does the manuscript contain new and significant information to justify publication? 2. Is the problem significant and concisely stated? 3. Are the experimental and/or theoretical methods described comprehensively? 4. Are the interpretations and conclusions justified by the results? 5. Is the abstract concise? 6. Is the language acceptable? Paper Size is: Adequate Too Long Too Short Tables and Figures are: Adequate Too Many Need More Recommendation Accept As Submitted Accept After Minor Revision (without Re-review) Revise And Reevaluate After Major Revision (with Re-review) Reject - Not Appropriate For Journal Reject - Insufficient New Information Reject - Scientifically Not Sound Would you be willing to review a revision of this manuscript? Comments Confidential Comments to Assistant Editor Comments to the Author |
» 猜你喜欢
溴的反应液脱色
已经有4人回复
参与限项
已经有5人回复
推荐一本书
已经有7人回复
有没有人能给点建议
已经有5人回复
假如你的研究生提出不合理要求
已经有12人回复
全日制(定向)博士
已经有5人回复
萌生出自己或许不适合搞科研的想法,现在跑or等等看?
已经有4人回复
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有4人回复
对氯苯硼酸纯化
已经有3人回复
所感
已经有4人回复
hfut1879
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 35456.7
- 散金: 2528
- 红花: 15
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 19169
- 在线: 1541.4小时
- 虫号: 573939
- 注册: 2008-06-15
- 专业: 金属功能材料
2楼2009-08-24 19:05:05
3楼2010-03-08 18:47:40
4楼2010-03-08 22:59:02












回复此楼