| 查看: 660 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
guohaodong1999金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
journal of biomedical materials reseach 的审稿标准,供参考
|
||
|
Instructions Please provide an editorial review that evaluates the scientific contribution made by the investigator. An acceptable paper should ask questions and provide some answers to significant problems related to the scope of the journal. Please give explicit judgmentin this regard. Also, please suggest modifications, if revision of the manuscript is recommended, and provide specific criticisms that will be helpgul to the authors when revising the manuscript. PRIORITY FOR PUBLICATION Top High Publish if space available Low Do not publish Questionnaire: 1. Does the manuscript contain new and significant information to justify publication? 2. Is the problem significant and concisely stated? 3. Are the experimental and/or theoretical methods described comprehensively? 4. Are the interpretations and conclusions justified by the results? 5. Is the abstract concise? 6. Is the language acceptable? Paper Size is: Adequate Too Long Too Short Tables and Figures are: Adequate Too Many Need More Recommendation Accept As Submitted Accept After Minor Revision (without Re-review) Revise And Reevaluate After Major Revision (with Re-review) Reject - Not Appropriate For Journal Reject - Insufficient New Information Reject - Scientifically Not Sound Would you be willing to review a revision of this manuscript? Comments Confidential Comments to Assistant Editor Comments to the Author |
» 猜你喜欢
40+中年人失业后,还能找到好工作吗?
已经有19人回复
关于核磁制样
已经有3人回复
郑州大学申博
已经有6人回复
人工智能虚构史料、伪造文献频现,多家期刊声明抵制
已经有5人回复
CsPbI2Br全无机钙钛矿SEM图像异常分析
已经有8人回复
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗?
已经有12人回复
hfut1879
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 3 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 35539.5
- 散金: 2528
- 红花: 15
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 19212
- 在线: 1544.4小时
- 虫号: 573939
- 注册: 2008-06-15
- 专业: 金属功能材料
2楼2009-08-24 19:05:05
3楼2010-03-08 18:47:40
4楼2010-03-08 22:59:02










回复此楼