| ²é¿´: 2086 | »Ø¸´: 2 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷ÕßÊ¢ÏĵĹûʵ91½«ÔùËÍÄú 10 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
Ê¢ÏĵĹûʵ91½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Éó¸åÈËÌá³ö¹ØÓÚXPSÈ¥¾í»ýµÄÎÊÌâ ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
|
|
Éó¸åÈËÌá³öÁ˹ØÓÚXPSÈ¥¾í»ýµÄÎÊÌ⣬ÎÒÊÇÓÃXPS PEAK 41·Ö·å´¦ÀíµÄ£¬²»ÖªµÀÕâô»Ø´ð¶Ô²»¶Ô¡£Çë¸÷λ³æÓѰïæ¿´¿´¡£Ð»Ð»£¡ Comment 4: Reg. XPS data, how the authors deconvolute the XPS curve? What is the reference for calibration? I want to see more sentences for this experiment. Answer 4: Thanks for the comment. The XPS spectrum deconvolution was performed by using the XPS PEAK 41 program with Lorentzian-Gaussian functions after subtraction of a Shirley background. The C 1s (284.8 eV) was used as the reference for the calibration. We have supplemented the details of XPS experiment in the revised manuscript. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ôõô²é°¡
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
»ù½ðϵͳʲôÄÚÈÝҲûÓÐ
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Ϊʲô×ÊÖúÊý¸÷´ó¸ßУ¶¼´´Ð¸ߣ¬×Ô¼ºÉêÇëÔõô¾ÍÕâôÄÑ
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
ÓжàÉÙÈËÊǽñÌì²éϵͳ֪µÀ½á¹ûµÄ£¿
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
¹ú×ÔÈ»ÃæÉϸ´ÅÌ~»¶ÓÌÖÂÛ
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÒ»ÇøÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8O5.5.1.O5.4,¿ÆÄ¿È«,¿ÉÙ¤¼±
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÄÄλ¸ßÈËÖÐÁË£¬°Ñ²éѯµ½µÄ½ØÍ¼Ìù³öÀ´ÈÃÎÒ¿´¿´£¬ÈÃÎÒ³¤³¤¼ûʶ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ÊÛSCIÎÄÕ£¬ÎÒ:8O5.5.1.O.54,¿ÆÄ¿ÆëÈ«,¿É+¼±
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÃæÉϺÏ×÷µ¥Î»¸ÇÕÂ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
µ¼Ê¦Í²ۣºÎÒÔõô̯ÉÏÁËÕâô¸ö¼«Æ·Ñо¿Éú£¡
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
С³ÇÒ¹ºÜÃÀ
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 26 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 2376.3
- É¢½ð: 102
- ºì»¨: 7
- Ìû×Ó: 445
- ÔÚÏß: 423.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3263565
- ×¢²á: 2014-06-09
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÎÞ»úÄÉÃ×»¯Ñ§
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¸Ðл²ÎÓ룬ӦÖúÖ¸Êý +1
| Äã·Ö·åÁËÖ®ºóÒ²ÒªÌÖÂÛÒ»ÏÂÿ¸ö·å¶ÔӦʲô£¬È»ºó¸øÉϲο¼ÎÄÏס£ |

2Â¥2021-10-30 07:29:10
Ê¢ÏĵĹûʵ91
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 10 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 821.6
- É¢½ð: 70
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 376
- ÔÚÏß: 114Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2788231
- ×¢²á: 2013-11-08
- רҵ: ÎÞ»úÄÉÃ×»¯Ñ§
|
лл£¡ÌÖÂÛÁ˵ģ¬ÔÚÕýÎÄÀïÒѾ¸øÁËÿ¸ö·å¶ÔÓ¦µÄλÖúͶÔÓ¦µÄÔªËØ¼Û̬£¬Ò²¸½ÉÏÁ˲ο¼ÎÄÏס£ÊÇ·ñÒÔÉϻشð¾Í¿ÉÒÔÁËÄØ£¿ |
3Â¥2021-10-30 09:39:27









»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
10