| 查看: 3458 | 回复: 29 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
大家帮忙看下MSEA还有希望吗，编辑给了个Reject and resubmit 已有1人参与
|
||
|
两个审稿人给的意见很两极分化，编辑最后给的Reject and Resubmit Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, the authors have systematically investigated xxxxxxxxxxxxxx. In general, the manuscript is very well written, and the results are of interest to steel community; therefore, I would like to suggest this effort for publication after some minor revisions. 三条意见还是比较好回答的 Reviewer #2: The present authors investigated the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. In conclusion, the reviewer could not recommend the submitted manuscript for publication, considering the scientific impact of the journal. The primary reason for this decision is a lack of novelty. Detailed comments are as followed. 扣的很仔细，16条意见，给的建议确实还行。属于工作程度很相似的同行，有些问题确实不太好回答，整个意见下来就没有对我工作的一句好话。。。。 Overall: The scientific novelty of the present study is weak. The purpose of the study was not clearly outlined nor were the findings of prior work properly discussed in the Introduction. In the Results and Discussion sections, the discussion was not sufficiently supported by the results to make scientific sense, nor did this work illustrate a new scientific advance. There is too much speculation; furthermore the English expression is not clear, understandable, and easy to interpret. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
某top大学教授说“能够在市场中兑现的能力才是真能力”无比同意！
已经有13人回复
12楼2021-08-03 14:43:17
2楼2021-08-03 02:45:03
3楼2021-08-03 03:27:08
haibozhang
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 21710.9
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 4013
- 在线: 82.1小时
- 虫号: 2543042
- 注册: 2013-07-12
- 专业: 物理化学
4楼2021-08-03 06:06:24
