| 查看: 3128 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 引力回声 的 56 个金币 | |||
[交流]
JMCA被拒，理由是缺少性能比较，请大家给点意见
|
|||
|
JMCA被编辑拒稿了，理由是没有充分比较最新研究。请大家帮忙看看我这个可以修改后重新投吗？先行谢过！ Thank you for your recent submission to Journal of Materials Chemistry A, published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. All manuscripts are initially assessed by the editors to ensure they meet the criteria for publication in the journal. After careful evaluation of your manuscript, I regret to inform you that I do not find your manuscript suitable for publication in Journal of Materials Chemistry A. Although you report organic semiconductor thermoset composite films using poly(3-hexylthiophene)-b-poly(ε-caprolactone) (P3HT-b-PCL) block copolymer nanofibers produced via crystallization-driven self-assembly, unfortunately the performance is not clearly compared to similar state-of-the-art materials, meaning that it is not possible to judge what improvements have been made over current literature in the area. Therefore, your article has been rejected from Journal of Materials Chemistry A. However, I am pleased to offer you the option to transfer your manuscript to the following journal(s) published by the Royal Society of Chemistry. Selecting one of these transfer options provides a quick and easy route for your manuscript to be considered by another journal without having to start a new submission. （RSC advances） If you have any questions about transferring your manuscript to one of these journal(s), please contact me and I will pass your query to the relevant editorial office. Full details of the initial assessment process can be found at https://www.rsc.org/journals-boo ... licies/#submissions I am sorry not to have better news for you, however, thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your manuscript. I look forward to hearing from you about the transfer of your manuscript from Journal of Materials Chemistry A to another Royal Society of Chemistry journal. Yours sincerely, Dr Michaela Mühlberg, MRSC Executive Editor Royal Society of Chemistry If you need to contact the journal, please use the email address MaterialsA@rsc.org 原文中的确缺少性能比较，还是说因为没有引用JMCA的文章呢。如果增加这些内容还有机会么？请大家给点意见  |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
什么时候开奖？
已经有4人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有27人回复
-
为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低？主要原因有哪些？
已经有3人回复
-
2027广东省杰青
已经有9人回复
-
朋友圈看到的
已经有5人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有110人回复
-
明天放榜？
已经有5人回复
-
时间戳变了，能看出什么问题？
已经有11人回复
-
重要消息，中午系统在维护
已经有10人回复
-
投稿咨询
已经有6人回复
Zafwai
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2411.1
- 帖子: 560
- 在线: 34.3小时
- 虫号: 4977181
- 注册: 2016-09-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属有机化学
★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
引力回声: 金币+3 2021-07-31 09:41:50
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
引力回声: 金币+3 2021-07-31 09:41:50
|
做一个性能比较，再引用一下我觉得还是有机会的（前提是你的东西确实有亮点） 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2021-07-31 01:31:43
longshu123
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2057.9
- 散金: 521
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 1662
- 在线: 370.3小时
- 虫号: 4123509
- 注册: 2015-10-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 数论
3楼2021-07-31 01:42:07
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
引力回声: 金币+5 2021-07-31 07:58:43
引力回声: 金币+5 2021-07-31 07:58:47
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
引力回声: 金币+5 2021-07-31 07:58:43
引力回声: 金币+5 2021-07-31 07:58:47
|
这个是执行编辑处理的，不是副编，执行编辑和出版编辑处理稿件经常因为没有性能比较不送审，加个表格做个性能对比呗。如果觉得文章质量不错，可以appeal。 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
4楼2021-07-31 01:42:49
5楼2021-07-31 07:12:57
6楼2021-07-31 09:42:34
7楼2021-09-24 00:20:10
130905045
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 11491.5
- 散金: 9330
- 红花: 15
- 沙发: 11
- 帖子: 4831
- 在线: 283.4小时
- 虫号: 3513723
- 注册: 2014-11-02
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 高分子科学
8楼2022-05-20 20:30:21
爱一回伤一回
新虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1187.5
- 散金: 3719
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 2835
- 在线: 297.7小时
- 虫号: 2585092
- 注册: 2013-08-07
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机材料化学
9楼2023-05-05 20:08:58
