ÔڻشðÉÏÃæÎÊÌâµÄ֮ǰ£¬ÎÒ¾ø¶ÔÓбØÒªÁ˽âÒ»ÏÂCASTEP¼ÆËã¹âѧÐÔÖʵÄÖ÷ÒªÔÀí£¬CASTEP¼ÆËãµÄ¹âѧÐÔÖÊÖ÷Òªµç×ÓÄÜ´ø½á¹¹ÖÐ×î»ù±¾µÄԾǨ·½Ê½£¬ÆäËûµÄ¿¼ÂDz»¶à£¬ÈçÉù×Ó£¨¾§¸ñÕñ¶¯ÎüÊÕ£©£¬¼¤×Ó£¬×ÔÓɵç×ÓÆø¹âѧÏìÓ¦µÈ£¬ÔÚCASTEPÀïÃæÒ²ÓÐÕâ¸ö˵Ã÷ÁË£¬±ÈÈ磺
Limitations of the methodLocal field effectsThe level of approximation used here does not take any local field effects into account. These arise from the fact that the electric field experienced at a particular site in the system is screened by the polarizability of the system itself. So, the local field is different from the applied external field (that is, the photon electric field). This can have a significant effect on the spectra calculated (see the example of bulk silicon calculation below) but it is prohibitively expensive to calculate for general systems at present.
Quasiparticles and the DFT bandgapIn order to calculate any spectral properties it is necessary to identify the Kohn-Sham eigenvalues with quasiparticle energies. Although there is no formal connection between the two, the similarities between the Schrödinger-like equation for the quasiparticles and the Kohn-Sham equations allow the two to be identified. For semiconductors, it has been shown computationally (by comparing GW and DFT band structures) that most of the difference between Kohn-Sham eigenvalues and the true excitation energies can be accounted for by a rigid shift of the conduction band upward with respect to the valence band (
Godby et al., 1992). This is attributed to a discontinuity in the exchange-correlation potential as the system goes from (N)-electrons to (N+1)-electrons during the excitation process. There can, in some systems, be considerable dispersion of this shift across the Brillouin zone, and the scissor operator used here will be insufficient.
Excitonic effectsIn connection with the absence of local field effects, excitonic effects are not treated in the present formalism. This will be of particular importance for ionic crystals (for example NaCl) where such effects are well known.
Other limitations
The nonlocal nature of the GGA exchange-correlation functionals is not taken into account when evaluating the matrix elements but it is expected that this will have a small effect on the calculated spectra.
Phonons and their optical effects have been neglected.
Finally, there is an intrinsic error in the matrix elements for optical transition due to the fact that pseudowavefunctions have been used (that is they deviate from the true wavefunctions in the core region). However, the selection rules will not be changed when going from pseudo- to all-electron wavefunctions
±ÈÈçµÚÒ»ÌõËù˵µÄ¾ÖÓò³¡Ð§Ó¦£¬ÎÒÃÇÔÚ¼ÆËã¹âѧԾǨµÄʱºò£¬Íâ½çԾǨ¼¤·¢µç³¡ÔÚ²ÄÁÏÄÚ²¿ÈÏΪÊÇûÓÐË¥¼õµÄ£¬Êµ¼ÊÉÏÓÉÓÚÄÚ³¡µÄ×÷Óã¬Ò»²¿·Öµç³¡»á±»ScreenÁË£¬µ«ÎÒÃÇûÓп¼ÂÇ¡£Æä´ÎÌáµ½ÁË£¬DFT¼ÆËãµÄµ¥Á£×Ó¼¤·¢Æ×·½Ãæ´æÔڵĵ͹ÀÎÊÌ⣬Õâ¸ö¿ÉÒÔͨ¹ýÒ»¸ö¶ÔÄÜ´øµÄ¸ÕÐÔÆ½ÒÆÊµÏÖ£¬Ò²¾ÍÊdz£ËµµÄ¼ôµ¶¹¤¾ß¡£ÉÏÃæÒ²Ìáµ½ÁËØÍÊÆ£¬ExcµÈЧӦ¶Ô¹âѧÐÔÖʵÄÓ°Ïì¡£
ÖÐËùÖÜÖªµÄÊÇOptical Properties £¨OP£©¼ÆËãÖ÷ÒªÊÇ´Ó¸´ºÏ½éµç·½³Ì¿ªÊ¼µÄ£¬ ½éµç·½³ÌÖÐÐ鲿±íʾÁ˺ÍÄÜ´øÖ®¼äԾǨÓйصÄÐÅÏ¢£¬·åÖµ¿ÉÄܺÍThe First Brillouin ZoneµÄVan£HOff singularity ÓйØÏµ£¬ÏÖÔÚDFT¼ÆËã½á¹¹±È½Ï¸´ÔÓ£¬Òª½âÎöÕâЩ¹ØÏµ£¬¼´¾ßÌåµÄ½âÎö³öBZ½á¹¹Öв»Í¬kµã¸½½üµÄVan£HoffÆæµãÊǺÜÀ§Äѵ쬲»¹ýÔÚ20ÊÀ½ç50Äê´úÒÔºóµÄºÜ¶àÎÄÏ×¶ÔһЩ¼òµ¥µÄ°ëµ¼Ìå½á¹¹×öÁ˼ÆË㣬ÈçAs£¬Si£¬AsPµÈ£¬ÕâЩÎïÖʾ§Ìå½á¹¹±È½Ï¼òµ¥£¬Òò´Ë¿ÉÒԱȽÏÏêϸµÄÁ˽âVan£HoffÆæµãµ½µ×ÔÚBZÇøÄǸöλÖá£