24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

lgd13

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 221.8
散金: 480
红花: 4
帖子: 281
在线: 83.6小时
虫号: 3240592
注册: 2014-05-28
性别: GG
专业: 微/纳机械系统

[交流] 求助关于EIS的审稿人意见已有1人参与

在关于不锈钢表面钝化膜EIS表征方面遇到审稿人的问题，不知道我理解的有没有问题，向大神们求助。Performing EIS measurement after 10 min or 40 min is not really relevant. We need to have stationarity of the system to characterize correctly the passive layer. Authors show that the potential still evolve during the EIS measurement and consequently the results they show is different from the first version but it is still not accurate.
- Consequently, The EEC used is not suitable and the parameters obtained for EIS diagram interpretation need to be studied with more attention. The physical meaning of this parameters must be the guidelines for a good understanding of the interface behavior and reactivity.
审稿人觉得我拟合的阻抗数据跟他的经验不符，数量级上差半个，觉得我的系统不够稳定造成的，我是用R(RQ)(RQ)模型拟合的结果，他觉得这个也有问题。
但是我做实验的时候ocp确实已经比较稳定了，而且拟合结果也挺好的，所以我打算再做长时间的静置，再测eis,再用R(Q(R(RQ)))拟合试试，确实对界面行为理解没那么透彻，不知道我对他的意见领会的对不对，请各位指点啊，小弟金币不足，下次再来感谢，求求各位大佬。

发自小木虫Android客户端

回复此楼