| ²é¿´: 609 | »Ø¸´: 0 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õߺ£ÉÏÀ½»Ô213½«ÔùËÍÄú 20 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
º£ÉÏÀ½»Ô213гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÄÄλXRD´óÉñÄܰïæָµ¼ÏÂÈçºÎ»Ø¸´Éó¸åÈËÎʵÄXRD¾«ÐÞ¡°Æ½Æë½Ç¡±·¨ÈçºÎ±£Ö¤½á¹û׼ȷÐÔµÄ
|
|
|
×î½ü¿ÎÌâ×éкϳÉÁËÒ»×鸴ºÏÎïͶÁËÆªÎÄÕ£¬¹ØÓÚ¸´ºÏ²ÄÁϵÄXRD±íÕ÷£¬Éó¸åÈËÎÊÁËÏÂÃæÕâ¸öÎÊÌ⣺ ¡°The signals in the XRD (Fig. 1) at low angles (eg values such as 3.43nm) obtained under traditional operating conditions are striking, which also include a relatively high scanning speed. The tried and true XRD analysis method for fine work in those areas is with flush angles. How do the authors guarantee that we are not dealing with an artifact or a possible error in the data processing (the lysate of the signals is notable)?¡± ÒòΪ±¾È˷DzÄÁÏרҵ£¬XRD±íÕ÷ÊǸö°ëµõ×Ó£¬²éÁ˸÷ÖÖ×ÊÁÏ£¬¶ÔÓÚÉó¸åÈËÌáµÄÕâ¸öÎÊÌâ²»ÖªÈçºÎÈëÊֻش𡣠ÄÄλ´óÀÐÄÜ·ñ°ïæ½â´ðÏ£¬Ð¡µÜ¸Ð¼¤²»¾¡£¡@Monash2011 |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
070300»¯Ñ§Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
±§Ç¸
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
»·¾³285·Ö£¬¹ýÁù¼¶£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
Çó²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ö£ÖÝ´óѧ289·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
»¯Ñ§µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
303Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤µ÷¼Á303·Ö£¬¹ýËļ¶
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
081200-11408-276ѧ˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
298·Ö 070300Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥