| 查看: 4191 | 回复: 19 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者whilst将赠送您 20 个金币 | |||
[求助]
投稿AFM被拒 一小修一大修一拒 还有必要argue吗 已有3人参与
|
|||
|
请各位帮我看看这种情况有必要argue吗?上诉有希望吗? Reviewer #1: This research reported the amino phosphonic acid resin as host to solve the lithium anode issues in LMBs. The APAR represents 3D and lithiophilic features, which is benefit to the absorption and deposition of Li. The results of experiments and computational simulation indicated the advantages of APAR in LMBs. However, the essence of the manuscript is just the common design of 3D lithiophilic host, which is not innovation enough for the current researches in LMBs. Meanwhile, the electrochemical performances of half and symmetrical cells in Figure 5 are also not good enough compared to other reported published literature. Therefore, it is not recommended to publish this manuscript in Advanced Functional Materials. Reviewer #2: The manuscript reports the application of cross-linked lithiophilic amino phosphonic acid resin as the effective host material for the lithium metal batteries. The half-cell shows a Coulombic efficiency (CE) of 98.8% over 130 cycles. The symmetrical cell exhibits stable cycling lifetime over 1150 hours with small voltage hysteresis of 16 mV. I would like to give a favorable recommendation if the authors address the following issues in a revision. 1. This has confused me for a long time, what are the actual differences between the Li-metal anodes with host materials and the graphite anodes. The theoretical capacity and potential have both weighed in the evaluation of the significances of the pure Li metal anode. Please provide the surface loading of the Li on the APAR host, and the theoretical capacity of this anode. 2. All the adsorption energies in Figure 4 are positive. A positive adsorption energy means that the adsorbate is thermodynamically unfavorable to be absorbed on the substrates. I guess the authors messed up with the sign of adsorption energies. The authors should refer to the comprehensive review (Energy Environ. Mater. 2019, 2, 264-279) about DFT calculations for battery materials. 3. In Figure 5f, the Cu@Li symmetric cell with the widely used ether based electrolyte (with 1 wt% LiNO3) exhibits the worst cycling stability that I has ever seen. 4. The author have some errors and typos in main text and reference section. Please carefully revise the manuscript. Reviewer #3: This manuscript reported that the dendrite growth of lithium metal anode was supressed by using cross-linked lithiophilic amino phosphonic acid resin (APAR) with Li+-pumping feature as the effective host. The Li-O2 full cells with APAR@Li anodes and Super P cathodes deliver high energy density and good cyclability due to the high reversibility of APAR@Li was applied. The working mechanism of APAR was demonstrated by DFT calculations and finite element simulation. This study reported a novel strategy for suppressing dendritic Li growth by guiding high and uniform Li+ concentration distribution at the electrode/electrolyte interface. The paper is well structured and provided a clear interpretation to help us understand the function of lithiophilic polymer in the suppression of lithium dendrite, therefore, I recommend the paper could be published in AFM with minor revision. 1. In Figure S5, the high Zeta potential of 3D APAR scaffold (nearly +33 mV) in the electrolyte confirms its strong affinity towards Li+ ions. Whether the absorption is from both physical absorption or chemical absorption? The pore volume of the 3D APAR scaffold should be measured to estimate the physical absorption if the equipment is available. 2. In this manuscript, experimental results give a clear evidence that the APAR can mitigate the volume change of the Li metal anode in Figure 2n. The detailed interpretation of how the APAR mitigate the volume change of lithium metal anode should be provided. 3. In Figure 5e, please explain why the impedance of APAR@Li decreases after cycling. |
» 猜你喜欢
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有6人回复
中科院杭州医学所招收博士生一名(生物分析化学、药物递送)
已经有4人回复
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
自荐读博
已经有6人回复
青基代表作,AAAI之类的A会的special track在国内认可度高吗?还是归为workshop之流?
已经有3人回复
上海工程技术大学【激光智能制造】课题组招收硕士
已经有6人回复
上海工程技术大学张培磊教授团队招收博士生
已经有4人回复
临港实验室与上科大联培博士招生1名
已经有9人回复
写了一篇“相变储能技术在冷库中应用”的论文,论文内容以实验为主,投什么期刊合适?
已经有6人回复
li19891108
金虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 22 (小学生)
- 金币: 981.7
- 散金: 5268
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 1697
- 在线: 312.5小时
- 虫号: 1222947
- 注册: 2011-03-06
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机分子功能材料化学

4楼2021-06-25 22:00:03
bobvan
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4779 (副教授)
- 金币: 32053.3
- 散金: 20745
- 红花: 350
- 帖子: 11157
- 在线: 1513.6小时
- 虫号: 2171443
- 注册: 2012-12-07
- 专业: 催化化学
【答案】应助回帖
| the essence of the manuscript is just the common design of 3D lithiophilic host, which is not innovation enough for the current researches in LMBs. Meanwhile, the electrochemical performances of half and symmetrical cells in Figure 5 are also not good enough compared to other reported published literature. 估计这两条有一条沾上就没有什么希望。我投稿也是三个审稿意见,第三个说性能不够好,结果就拒了。申诉后,编辑让转投 Small,懒得折腾,转投后很快接收(没有再外审) |
6楼2021-06-27 02:32:51
lihl910807
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2404.8
- 散金: 4600
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 1155
- 在线: 61.9小时
- 虫号: 3509401
- 注册: 2014-10-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 催化化学
2楼2021-06-25 14:56:44
bobvan
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4779 (副教授)
- 金币: 32053.3
- 散金: 20745
- 红花: 350
- 帖子: 11157
- 在线: 1513.6小时
- 虫号: 2171443
- 注册: 2012-12-07
- 专业: 催化化学
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
| the essence of the manuscript is just the common design of 3D lithiophilic host, which is not innovation enough for the current researches in LMBs. Meanwhile, the electrochemical performances of half and symmetrical cells in Figure 5 are also not good enough compared to other reported published literature. 估计这两条有一条沾上就没有什么希望。我投稿也是三个审稿意见,第三个说性能不够好,结果就拒了。申诉后,编辑让转投 Small,懒得折腾,转投后很快接收(没有再外审) |
5楼2021-06-27 02:32:18
7楼2021-06-27 10:47:30
8楼2021-06-27 10:50:34
国际科学编辑
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1532 (讲师)
- 金币: 3627.6
- 散金: 613
- 红花: 275
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 7972
- 在线: 146.9小时
- 虫号: 4407167
- 注册: 2016-02-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 病原微生物变异与耐药
9楼2021-06-27 10:56:19
17楼2021-06-28 16:09:59
3楼2021-06-25 16:40:11
|
祝福。 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
10楼2021-06-27 10:56:46







回复此楼