| ²é¿´: 524 | »Ø¸´: 6 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
huhuawen2664½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
¼±ÇóÖú
|
||
| ±»european polymer journal ¼¼ÊõÉóºË²»¹ý¹Ø£¬sent back to auther ÁË£¬ÏÖÔڸĺÃÁË£¬Õâ¸öÔõÑùÖØÍ¶°¡£¬ÐèÒªµ¥¶ÀÄ£°å˵Ã÷Â𣬻¹ÊÇÖ±½ÓÖØÐÂͶ¸å¾Í¿ÉÒÔÁË£¬ÓÐÖªµÀ¸ÃÔÓÖ¾µÄÇé¿öÂð£¬Ð»Ð»£¡£¡£¡£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
¼±Ðèµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
É격/¿¼²©
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
»¯¹¤Ñ§Ë¶294·Ö£¬Çóµ¼Ê¦ÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ37È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
260Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐũҵ071010£¬320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ç󲩵¼£üÉúÎïÖÊ»ù¶à¿×̼/³¬¼¶µçÈÝ·½Ïò£¬ÒÑÓÐÏà¹Ø³É¹û£¬Ñ°ÄÜÔ´²ÄÁÏ/̼²ÄÁÏ·½ÏòÀÏʦ
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¶þ±½¼×ͪËáÀàÑÜÉúÎï
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
½ÓÊÜÈκε÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
jjyyldxm
ͳæ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 57.3
- É¢½ð: 199
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 936
- ÔÚÏß: 649Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 192813
- ×¢²á: 2006-02-21
- רҵ: ÈÏÖª¿ÆÑ§¼°ÖÇÄÜÐÅÏ¢´¦Àí
3Â¥2009-08-14 18:06:17
wolf3769
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1663.7
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 1531
- ÔÚÏß: 82.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 711496
- ×¢²á: 2009-02-28
- רҵ: Õ½ÂÔ¹ÜÀí
2Â¥2009-08-14 15:55:49
hfut1879
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 35474.7
- É¢½ð: 2528
- ºì»¨: 15
- ɳ·¢: 4
- Ìû×Ó: 19179
- ÔÚÏß: 1542Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 573939
- ×¢²á: 2008-06-15
- רҵ: ½ðÊô¹¦ÄܲÄÁÏ
4Â¥2009-08-14 18:14:17
hjh8093
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 6185.1
- É¢½ð: 90
- Ìû×Ó: 798
- ÔÚÏß: 243.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 684981
- ×¢²á: 2008-12-30
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Äý¾Û̬ÎïÐÔ II £ºµç×ӽṹ
¡ï ¡ï
huhuawen2664(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0): 8-15 07:02
huhuawen2664(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0): 8-15 07:02
|
Ҫдһ¸ö¡°Responses to technical check results¡±ÏÂÃæÊÇÄ£°å£º Dear Editor, Thank you for your letter in......concerning my submission to ..... According to your comments and suggestion, we have made a very careful revision to the previous manuscript. 1)In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journal's desired standard. There are a number of grammatical errors and instances of badly worded/constructed sentences. Please check the manuscript and refine the language carefully. We have revised the WHOLE manuscript carefully and tried to avoid any grammar or syntax error. And we have corrected some badly word/constructed sentences and refined the language. Furthermore, we have invited a professor of our university, who is a proficient English speaker, to go through the manuscript and check the English.. With the above mentioned revisions performed, we believe that the newly prepared manuscript in accordance with the requirement of Journal of Hazardous Materials. We hope that these revisions are satisfactory and that the revised version can be sent out for peer review. The manuscript has been resubmitted to your journal. We look forward to your positive response. With you all best wishes! Yours sincerely, |
5Â¥2009-08-14 20:15:43













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
