| 查看: 839 | 回复: 2 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者原力男孩将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
[求助]
SCI论文外审被拒，AE建议修改重投。
|
||
|
家人们，请问一下审稿人这种意见如何修改啊！？救救孩子吧！ The paper is lacking a framework to help readers understand easily. In particular, the research is not well designed to integrate the introduction, research objective, data and methods, and discussion in a coherent way. It does not add significant value to the existing body of literature. Furthermore, there is no significant research conducted in related areas and only a few research papers seem to have been included in this work. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿
已经有18人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有12人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有17人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有7人回复
-
谈谈两天一夜的“延安行”
已经有15人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
-
聘U V热熔胶研究人员
已经有10人回复
-
求助文献
已经有3人回复
-
投稿返修后收到这样的回复，还有希望吗
已经有8人回复
-
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
2楼2021-06-15 12:01:56
3楼2021-06-15 17:14:27