| 查看: 984 | 回复: 2 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者原力男孩将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
[求助]
SCI论文外审被拒,AE建议修改重投。
|
||
|
家人们,请问一下审稿人这种意见如何修改啊!?救救孩子吧! The paper is lacking a framework to help readers understand easily. In particular, the research is not well designed to integrate the introduction, research objective, data and methods, and discussion in a coherent way. It does not add significant value to the existing body of literature. Furthermore, there is no significant research conducted in related areas and only a few research papers seem to have been included in this work. |
» 猜你喜欢
面上有专家说实验设备不是我们单位的
已经有8人回复
科研求助
已经有4人回复
博士去二本高校当辅导员,如何调整心态?
已经有11人回复
江苏省自然基金 什么时候出结果
已经有6人回复
闲聊
已经有3人回复
初秋的晨风
已经有6人回复
2楼2021-06-15 12:01:56
3楼2021-06-15 17:14:27









回复此楼