24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3157  |  回复: 10

jianjunjiang

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 大家部帮我看看这个审稿人的意见,是reject还是revise 已有3人参与

in this work, the divalent cation adsorption on the periphery of the large pore in monolayer graphene oxide membranes acts on water desalination have been studied using molecular dynamics simulations. it reports that the presence of the divalent cation on the rim of the pore can not only reduce the amount of the salt ions located in the region around the pore but also prolong their permeation time across the pore, subsequently leading to the remarkable enhancement of the salt rejection rate. moreover, the role of graphene oxidation degree on water desalination is also elucidated. the water desalination performance of the pore with adsorbed divalent cation is more robust against oxidation degree variation. this result offers significant instructions to the excogitation of the new nanoporous graphene oxide membranes for high-performance water desalination. even if the results of the manuscript are potentially interesting, there are still some problems that are not stated clearly. for this reason, the publication of the manuscript in the present until the present points are addressed:

(1) how the mg 2+ ions fixed near the pore in the simulations? how to maintain the stability of mg 2+ ions in md simulations?
(2) how does salt ion distribution affect salt rejection rate? is there a quantitative relationship?
(3) authors reported that the pore exhibits an excellent desalination performance at some certain oxidation. can this optimized parameter be defined in md simulation?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

一季晴天

新虫 (小有名气)

修订后接收,就是个大修或中修的审稿意见。

发自小木虫IOS客户端

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

2楼2021-05-31 13:21:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

国际科学编辑

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
基于这份review report,应该是major revision

发自小木虫IOS客户端

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

6楼2021-06-01 08:02:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

奋斗的cat

新虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jianjunjiang: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢! 2021-05-31 18:59:51
很常规的叙述,有一句肯定了你的工作,问题看起来也不刁钻大概率修改后接受了
4楼2021-05-31 17:54:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bobvan

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jianjunjiang: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助, 谢谢! 2021-06-01 10:32:11
"even if the results of the manuscript are potentially interesting, there are still some problems that are not stated clearly. for this reason, the publication of the manuscript in the present until the present points are addressed:"

需要修改后才有被接收的可能
5楼2021-06-01 04:36:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

jianjunjiang

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 一季晴天 at 2021-05-31 13:21:09
修订后接收,就是个大修或中修的审稿意见。

谢谢!
3楼2021-05-31 13:33:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jianjunjiang

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by 国际科学编辑 at 2021-06-01 08:02:59
基于这份review report,应该是major revision

谢谢!
7楼2021-06-01 10:32:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xing122010

新虫 (小有名气)

从头到尾哪里提到拒稿了??明显是修改啊
8楼2021-06-01 16:21:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nhhaa19

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

9楼2021-07-11 07:07:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

163132314ya

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

研究型学者

修改后可能发表的意思,整个comments给出了比较正面的评价。好好修改就是了
宁静致远
10楼2021-07-11 08:51:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 jianjunjiang 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见