24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2089  |  回复: 22
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

gion

金虫 (正式写手)

[交流] PRE被拒!!!!!贴出理由来。

3个审稿人的意见:

I went through the paper and the author's note. One of my reservations
is that, there is considerable overlap with earlier publications.  In
addition, there continues to be some short comings with the
formulation, namely, the use of Serret-Frenet framing which does not
work on straight sectors. Such sectors can develop  even with an initial
shape that is everywhere curved if one considers  shape transformations,
which is a focus of the present research.

My overall view is, the present paper is not suitable for publication
in Physical Review E.

Since the present work has been compared against Ref[3] which gives it
an experimental context, the author can consider for instance,
submitting in PNAS where those experiments have been reported.

第一个不是个大问题,是审稿人一厢情愿纠缠住这个问题不放。
第二个似乎太牛,直接拒搞!毫无理由。
第三个太吓人,居然要我投PNAS。

虫子们给点意见,投其他杂志觉得有些可惜!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mandolin

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

小木虫之如花传奇


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
引用回帖:
Originally posted by truwbtime at 2009-8-12 16:49:
主要是因为你的数据与参考文献3的数据相违背,直接投稿那个杂志可以推翻他们的结论

the present work has been compared against Re数据相违背??????????????
生活是一日接着一日
9楼2009-08-12 17:00:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 23 个回答

joymyself2006

银虫 (正式写手)

学习了!!!!!
我的成长路上一直有小木虫的陪伴!
2楼2009-08-12 15:43:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
本帖仅楼主可见
3楼2009-08-12 15:46:10
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页

yu20087537

金虫 (正式写手)

是的,第三个人很牛
4楼2009-08-12 15:53:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见