24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (2134)
>虫友互识 (349)
>基金申请 (70)
>休闲灌水 (65)
>论文投稿 (52)
>博后之家 (35)
>文献求助 (31)
>导师招生 (27)
>硕博家园 (20)
>考博 (10)
>教师之家 (9)
>考研 (9)
>药学 (8)
>公派出国 (7)
>论文道贺祈福 (3)
>找工作 (3)

返回列表

【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 kerenxing 的 65 个金币，回帖就立即获得 1 个金币，每人有 1 次机会

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

kerenxing

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 21 (小学生)
金币: 1938.7
帖子: 888
在线: 186.4小时
虫号: 3139211

[交流] Applied Intelligence编辑预审大修，但审稿意见是拒稿

上个月投的applied intelligence，一直是with the editor状态，前几天状态未经under review突然变成了major revision，网上查了一下原来这个期刊搞了一个编辑预审环节。
我的论文给的审稿意见是：based on the advice received, the editor feels that your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication should you be prepared to incorporate major revisions. when preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which are attached, and submit a list of responses to the comments. your list of responses should be uploaded as a file in addition to your revised manuscript.

Reviewer #1: This paper lacks originality and novelty from applied intelligence perspective. Authors have used well recognized and published methodologies with some modifications. Thus, the paper is not suitable for publication in Applied Intelligence.

审稿意见都建议拒稿了，这让我怎么修改？有遇到同样情况的小伙伴吗？求指导。

[ Last edited by kerenxing on 2021-5-21 at 16:48 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2021-05-21 16:29:17

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

kerenxing

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 21 (小学生)
金币: 1938.7
帖子: 888
在线: 186.4小时
虫号: 3139211

引用回帖:

8楼: Originally posted by shizenan at 2021-05-21 16:40:27
这是意见吗，也不是拒稿啊，就是大修

Reviewer #1: This paper lacks originality and novelty from applied intelligence perspective. Authors have used well recognized and published methodologies with some modifications. Thus, the paper is not suitable for publication in Applied Intelligence.

发自小木虫Android客户端