| 查看: 215 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
vividelife银虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
【求助完毕】英译汉SOS。。。
|
||
|
本人是做弱相互作用的，最近来了一个修改意见如下，可我看不大懂，敬请翻译成汉语： the authors may have missed the point regarding a suggested attempt to correlate electrostatic terms with total interaction energy. While Fig 9 does relate to electrostatics, it does not provide any quantitative data, merely that Na is electropositive, which is certainly what one would have expected. What is needed instead is some quantitative estimate of the electrostatic interaction, which might be an energy, or even some dipole term, but the important thing is that it be quantitative. 谢谢！ [ Last edited by qingshaojun0823 on 2009-8-19 at 11:07 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
考博求助
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有9人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有10人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
pitlord999
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1447.3
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 284
- 在线: 24.4小时
- 虫号: 822142
- 注册: 2009-08-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
4楼2009-08-10 20:55:11
seebrightplan
木虫 (著名写手)
Solider
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 10372.4
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 2441
- 在线: 233.1小时
- 虫号: 425852
- 注册: 2007-07-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 零件成形制造
2楼2009-08-10 17:42:31
pitlord999
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1447.3
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 284
- 在线: 24.4小时
- 虫号: 822142
- 注册: 2009-08-04
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
★ ★
vividelife(金币+1,VIP+0): 8-10 20:03
linghanyuan(金币+1,VIP+0):谢谢参与 8-10 21:11
vividelife(金币+1,VIP+0): 8-10 20:03
linghanyuan(金币+1,VIP+0):谢谢参与 8-10 21:11
|
the authors may have missed the point regarding a suggested attempt to correlate electrostatic terms with total interaction energy. While Fig 9 does relate to electrostatics, it does not provide any quantitative data, merely that Na is electropositive, which is certainly what one would have expected. What is needed instead is some quantitative estimate of the electrostatic interaction, which might be an energy, or even some dipole term, but the important thing is that it be quantitative. 作者可能忽视了将electrostatic项和总相互作用能联系起来的建议。 图9和electrostatics无关，也没有提供任何定量的数据，仅仅是表明Na是electropositive的，这根本就是意料之中的。 需要作者做的是对electrostatic 相互作用的定量估计， 它可能是能量项， 可能是dipole（双极？）项， 最重要的是它是一个定量的项。 |
3楼2009-08-10 17:57:37
