| ²é¿´: 477 | »Ø¸´: 4 | ||
| ¡¾½±Àø¡¿ ±¾Ìû±»ÆÀ¼Û3´Î£¬×÷ÕßsdxnÔö¼Ó½ð±Ò 2.5 ¸ö | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | ||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||
sdxnľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[×ÊÔ´]
¡¾·ÖÏí¡¿Science Aug. 2009 ÉÏһƪÊý×ÖÍÁÈÀͼµÄÎÄÕÂ
|
|
|
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/325/5941/680 Soils are increasingly recognized as major contributors to ecosystem services such as food production and climate regulation (1, 2), and demand for up-to-date and relevant soil information is soaring. But communicating such information among diverse audiences remains challenging because of inconsistent use of technical jargon, and outdated, imprecise methods. Also, spatial resolutions of soil maps for most parts of the world are too low to help with practical land management. While other earth sciences (e.g., climatology, geology) have become more quantitative and have taken advantage of the digital revolution, conventional soil mapping delineates space mostly according to qualitative criteria and renders maps using a series of polygons, which limits resolution. These maps do not adequately express the complexity of soils across a landscape in an easily understandable way. È«ÎÄ£ºhttp://d.namipan.com/d/200126a47 ... 8d2b435e73ee2bb0100 http://d.namipan.com/d/200126a4727a8e2aeb89da6d0bc0e8d2b435e73ee2bb0100 |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÉÇÍ·´óѧ - º£ÑóµØÖÊѧ - ×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³ - ÉÙÁ¿µ÷¼ÁÃû¶î£¬4ÔÂ14ÈÕ16µãǰ
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
µØá£»·Á÷˵2.0
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
µØÇòÎïÀíѧºÍ¿Õ¼äÎïÀíѧÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ274È˻ظ´
¼Æ»®Í¶×Ê2ÒÚµÄÌØÌá˹¼Æ»®¶¯Á¦»úÖÆÎÊÌ⣬ħ¶¼Ãñ¹¤ÌôÕ½ÖпÆÔºÏà¹ØÈËÔ±£¬ËµÄ¸üÓеÀÀí£¿
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
3Â¥2009-09-11 15:25:26
2Â¥2009-09-11 09:11:28
5Â¥2009-09-18 13:41:41














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥