24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

newtime

铁虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 3445.7
散金: 934
帖子: 433
在线: 52.7小时
虫号: 685512
注册: 2008-12-31
性别: GG

[交流] 四个审稿人，编辑最后Major revisions，太难搞了！！

今天收到编辑的Major revisions，四个审稿人，其中有一个审稿人提出的问题实难回答，主要是他要求补加6篇参考文献（连参考文献的著录格式全部都编排好了），全都是和我的文章风马牛不相及的文献，其中有3篇参考文献中有同一个作者，我感觉是不是这个审稿人就是他！关键是这6篇参考文献没有一篇相关的（他还专门在投稿系统中上传了两篇PDF格式的），有没有编辑把审稿意见搞混了这一说法？能不能写信问一下编辑是不是搞错了，关键是从他的意见中看不出一个与我文章内容相关的词语，
像这个审稿意见可以用于任何人的文章都合适，根本没办法看出是不是在说我的文章，具体如下：
Reviewer #3: Although considerable work was done toward writing a good quality manuscript, there are several issues to be addressed prior to its acceptance;
1. Abstract: It has to be re-written in part (by including more numerical data based on the authors' results) in order to make the abstract more appealing and informative to the average reader.
2. Introduction: A paragraph should be added related to multivariate analysis where, at least, the following references should be reported;
i) ******
ii) ******
iii) ******
iv) ******
v) ******
vi) ******（参考文献，连格式都写好了）
The above-mentioned articles, apart from being quoted in Introduction, they could be also used in the Results and Discussion part for comparison purposes with the authors’' obtained data.
3. Results and Discussion. The authors are asked to apply one or more of the following multivariate analyses (Cluster analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Discriminant Analysis)in order to optimize the presentation of their data and to reach more valid conclusions.
4. Conclusions. This section has to be re-written as well taking into account the reviewer's comments for the Abstract.
5. The entire text will have to get improved linguistically by being revised by a native English speaker.

DOWNLOAD COMMENTS / ATTACHED FILE FROM YOUR ACCOUNT!
就这么多，附带了两篇PDF格式的参考文献，让我很糊涂，虫友们有没有遇到过这样情况的？可以帮忙分析一下，能不能问一下编辑，哪位大侠能帮忙给个好点的模板问问编辑？要是编辑说正确无误就死心了，但很难回答引用他给出的参考文献，不引用肯定被毙的，目前正在考虑这篇文章是不是扔了算了，简直太难了！！谢谢大家

回复此楼