| 查看: 152 | 回复: 1 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
hunter0308木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
首发Oxford Press科学写作指南：A Field guide for science writers，2ed
|
||
|
A Field guide for science writers: the official guide of the National Association of Science Writers http://www.nasw.org/ This is the official text for the National Association of Science Writers. In the eight years since the publication of the first edition of A Field Guide for Science Writing, much about the world has changed. Some of the leading issues in today's political marketplace - embryonic stem cell research, global warming, health care reform, space exploration, genetic privacy, germ warfare - are informed by scientific ideas. Never has it been more crucial for the lay public to be scientifically literate. That's where science writers come in. And that's why it's time for an update to the Field Guide, already a staple of science writing graduate programs across the country. The academic community has recently recognized how important it is for writers to become more sophisticated, knowledgeable, and skeptical about what the write. More than 50 institutions now offer training in science writing. In addition mid-career fellowships for science writers are growing, giving journalists the chance to return to major universities for specialized training. We applaud these developments, and hope to be part of them with this new edition of the Field Guide. In A Field Guide for Science Writers, 2nd Edition, the editors have assembled contributions from a collections of experinced journalists who are every bit as stellar as the group that contributed to the first edition. In the end, what we have are essays written by the very best in the science writing profession. These wonderful writers have written not only about style, but about content, too. These leaders in the profession describe how they work their way through the information glut to find the gems worth writing about. We also have chapters that provide the tools every good science writer needs: how to use statistics, how to weigh the merits of conflicting studies in scientific literature, how to report about risk. And, untimately, how to write. http://depositfiles.com/en/files/2587064 The link above is the only mirror still working, if your Ip forbids you to visit this side, you can get the book in appendix. Hope this book will help you, enjoy it. Good Luck  [ Last edited by hunter0308 on 2009-7-30 at 13:31 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
297，工科调剂?
已经有4人回复
-
恳请有学校收留
已经有7人回复
-
291求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
300求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
22专硕求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
材料相关专业344求调剂双非工科学校或课题组
已经有25人回复
-
急需调剂
已经有7人回复
-
求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
一志愿华中农业071010，320求调剂
已经有16人回复
-
304求调剂
已经有5人回复
12503022
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1075.9
- 散金: 889
- 帖子: 311
- 在线: 41.9小时
- 虫号: 525366
- 注册: 2008-03-14
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 微生物资源与分类学
2楼2009-07-30 14:27:18
