| 查看: 3082 | 回复: 10 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
拒稿鼓励重投，求各位帮忙分析这份意见有戏不 已有8人参与
|
|||
|
投稿后一个月被拒，编辑回复： This to inform you that your manuscript was subjected to a peer referee for evaluation. As you will see from the enclosed comments, your manuscript, in its current form, was rejected for publication in our Journal. Refer especially to the Section Editor's file attached. As per our peer referee, the manuscript’s general impression is not corresponding to the journal's guidelines. Hopefully, if you manage to rewrite the manuscript sufficiently, you are very welcome to submit it again as a new one. 两个审稿人意见不一致，编辑回复如下，感觉态度比较友好，附了带很多修改标记的manuscript，这种情况修改回去有机会么？ Section Editor recommendation: After receiving two extremely different reviews, I had to study this manuscript carefully. Unfortunately, I must agree with reviewer 1. In this form, the manuscript is not ready for publication in xx Moreover, the number of issues and shortcomings present in the study is causing the need to thoroughly rewrite the article if the authors want to publish it in xx The main issues are: - weak English - inappropriate usage of references - the unsuitable level of introduction and discussion paragraphs All of my comments are in the attached file. Nevertheless, the presented technique is fascinating, so I am waiting impatiently for the new manuscript. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
大佬帮着分析今年的评审意见？该课题连续申请了三年了，明年要不要换个方向。
已经有11人回复
-
两块石头
已经有10人回复
-
广西大学-广州大学招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才！！！
已经有8人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有19人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有15人回复
-
面上没中，邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有13人回复
-
初秋的晨风
已经有6人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有9人回复
-
Ei源刊怎么投
已经有4人回复
zhaopeng92
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 7 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 755.8
- 散金: 2370
- 红花: 8
- 帖子: 1205
- 在线: 126.4小时
- 虫号: 3487512
- 注册: 2014-10-20
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 建筑环境与结构工程
4楼2020-12-27 13:30:31
专送一血
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 48 (小学生)
- 金币: 9119.9
- 散金: 2280
- 红花: 54
- 帖子: 3555
- 在线: 168.7小时
- 虫号: 3490731
- 注册: 2014-10-22
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料的合金相、相变及
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
看得出来编辑还是希望你重投的，可能创新点很好，数据也不错，只是写得不好，建议你重新写introduction和discussion，再拿出去润色下，附上润色证明。 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2020-12-26 16:53:33
3楼2020-12-27 08:35:57
，不过还好用的是AJE的高级润色可以多次润色的版本。多谢指导！ 5楼2020-12-27 14:59:05