| 查看: 3309 | 回复: 8 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者binggan13将赠送您 5 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
IEEE ACCESS审稿意见回复求助 已有2人参与
|
|||
|
Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Reject (updates required before resubmission) Comments: * Language and presentation should be improved. * What is the motivation for the study? Literature has several anomaly & intrusion detection models. Why they are not applicable for the current scenario. As the authors have focused on a specific application, what are the characteristics of the application that demand a new proposal? * Further figures are very generic. Like Fig 1, 2, are already available in literature and Fig 3, 4, 5, 6 to the problem is very generic. Further figure numbering is wrong. authors should take extra care. * Literature has the experiements and analysis with the similar techniques and on the same datasets such as: Intrusion detection model using fusion of chi-square feature selection and multi class SVM, 2017. Integrated intrusion detection model using chi-square feature selection and ensemble of classifiers, 2019. These are few examples. There are several literature dealing with similar techniques * Authors should make a comparison in terms of proposal, experiments and validate the results. Additional Questions: 1) Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: to some extent 2) Is the paper technically sound?: to some extent 3) Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: to some extent 4) Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: no 5) Are there references that are not appropriate for the topic being discussed?: No Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Reject (updates required before resubmission) Comments: Authors presented a better work entitled, Anomaly Detection and Attack Classification for Train Real-time Ethernet. However, authors are recommended to consider the following points, 1. Abstract requires revision in the last section/part to specify clearly how presented research performing significantly over the existing ones. 3. A few of the figure’s resolutions requires improvement, specially presented in table number 7. 4. Conclusion requires revision, to be more specify about their significant achievements. 5. Provided references are better enough. However, authors are recommended for the following, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04319-2 6. A thorough proofread is required. Additional Questions: 1) Does the paper contribute to the body of knowledge?: Yes, 2) Is the paper technically sound?: Yes, 3) Is the subject matter presented in a comprehensive manner?: Yes, 4) Are the references provided applicable and sufficient?: Yes, provided references are better enough. However, authors need to read the following as well. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04319-2 5) Are there references that are not appropriate for the topic being discussed?: No Reviewer: 3 Recommendation: Reject (updates required before resubmission) Comments: They need to explain why they are using old datasets. The figures starting from figure-9 are not clear at all. Was it necessary to add so many images? 小白第一次投稿，求助各位大佬看看有戏吗，以及哪些是棘手问题，需要慎重考虑回复的。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
一志愿华科071000生物学 338求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
290求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
308求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
0856化工原理
已经有5人回复
-
289求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
材料与化工085600调剂求老师收留
已经有4人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
（081700）化学工程与技术-298分求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
求调剂
已经有5人回复
【答案】应助回帖
|
虽然三位审稿人都是拒绝，但也都留下修改重送的机会，也给出改进的方向，逐条对论文修正会大大提升改投的成功率。第一位审稿人主要是要求作者说明此研究和先前研究不同之处，特别是方法论上。第一和第二位也提到dataset的问题，确认一下引用的是否是最新的数据，如果必需引用较早的数据，请说明理由。 值得注意的是两名审稿人提到语言和图例编辑上的问题，这是中国作者投稿国际期刊常见的审稿人回复，通常期刊会建议作者寻求英语母语学科专家的协助。并请他们附上编修证明书声明语言问题已经得到改善。国内有许多聘有英美学科母语专家的润色公司可以帮您解决这个问题。还有熟悉投稿规定，经验丰富的投稿专家帮您调整图表格式、解析度，省去自己阅读投稿规定以及排版、检查的时间，帮助您专注于内容质量的提升上。 |
9楼2021-07-26 15:45:43
2楼2020-12-24 21:10:33
|
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
3楼2020-12-24 21:42:42
4楼2020-12-30 09:04:07
