| 查看: 359 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者期待成长将赠送您 20 个金币 | ||
期待成长捐助贵宾 (知名作家)
突破自己、用心成长
|
[求助]
求助大神，MDPI的materials审稿意见，在线等
|
|
|
如题，各位大神指教，第一次投materials，一路审稿走来，磕磕绊绊，现在有两个审稿意见回来，不知道大家是怎么看出来审稿人的态度的（经常看到有的人说一个接受一个拒稿之类的），我把两个审稿人评价挂出来，大家帮忙看下 审稿人1 Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) Is the research design appropriate? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Are the methods adequately described? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Are the results clearly presented? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Are the conclusions supported by the results? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) 审稿人2 Yes Can be improved Must be improved Not applicable Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Is the research design appropriate? ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) Are the methods adequately described? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Are the results clearly presented? ( ) ( ) (x) ( ) Are the conclusions supported by the results? ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) 这个是审稿人评价都不高吗？第一个是拒了吗？看他的意见，对结果好像有质疑，第二个整体态度较好，补充几个说明和实验就好了，麻烦大家帮我看下，科研小白在这里谢谢大家了 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
329求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
复试调剂
已经有4人回复
-
求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料调剂
已经有10人回复
-
292求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
一志愿211，化学学硕，310分，本科重点双非，求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
363求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
0703总分331求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
材料专硕(0856) 339分求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
求调剂
已经有3人回复
