| 查看: 699 | 回复: 0 | ||
caijing1986铜虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
专业翻译英文摘要
|
|
Standard Versus Extended Duration DirectActing Antiviral Therapy in Hepatitis C Patients With Slow Response to Treatment Abstract Background: Response-guided hepatitis C therapy was standard with interferon-based regimens but is not used for direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Week 4 viral kinetics may predict sustained virological response (SVR) with DAAs, but it is unclear whether extending therapy in slow responders affects outcomes. Objectives: The primary objective was to compare SVR rates between traditional and extended duration groups. Secondary objectives were to compare SVR rates among subgroups and to determine factors associated with SVR. Methods: This institutional review board–approved, retrospective, single-center study identified patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with detectable week 4 HCV RNA who were treated with DAAs. Patients were excluded for early discontinuation, treatment regimen not recommended first-line, or missing HCV RNA labs. Patients were stratified into traditional and extended duration groups. The primary end point was SVR. Secondary end points included factors associated with SVR and rationale for extension of therapy duration. Results: A total of 363 patients were included; 58 (16%) received extended therapy. Patients were primarily genotype 1a (70%) and treatment naïve (80%). More than half had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. SVR12 rates were 100% in the extended duration group and 96.7% in the traditional duration group (P = 0.37). There were no associations with SVR and prespecified patient-specific factors. Sample size was limited. Conclusion and Relevance:Based on these findings, a recommendation for extension of therapy cannot be made for patients with detectable HCV RNA at week 4 of treatment at this time. Cost analyses may help guide recommendations to re-treat rare failures versus extend therapy in all slow responders. Keywords hepatitis C, response-guided therapy, direct-acting antivirals |
» 猜你喜欢
2026年WR青拔进展
已经有7人回复
职称论文投稿
已经有11人回复
中!中!中!
已经有10人回复
会评什么时候开始?
已经有4人回复
国自然申请五篇代表作大比拼,感觉这个是最重要的
已经有12人回复
无聊看看时间戳打发时间
已经有4人回复
咨询
已经有3人回复
基于自然哲学类比的风化壳型稀土矿
已经有14人回复
评委有多少概率知道其他专家手中有哪些人的本子?
已经有6人回复
求推荐期刊,重谢
已经有3人回复











回复此楼