24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 173  |  回复: 2
当前主题已经存档。

linlan8336

金虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 审稿意见求助(帮忙看看啊)

下面有两条意见,我想问下大家是不是所有的意见都必须在论文中修改呢? 我感觉下面这两条就是评委提的疑问,实在不知道论文中该怎么修改才能体现. 我想只在审稿回复中给评委解释,论文中不作修改,不知道这样好不好?

有经验的牛们给我建议下哈,这都是第二次大修了,对我很重要的,毕竟花费了这么多心血. 不知道两次大修后还有多大的机会啊?

D)     In case a deal opportunity is identified by the Mediator, both Buyer and Seller generate offers in the context of the quantity scope [qb, qs]. Having read the test case, different offers are generated by both agents, under the assumption that the quantity is a discrete parameter, by setting quantity value equal to qb, qb+1, qb+2, … What happens in case qs>>qb? What happens in case quantity is a continuous variable?
F)     Could the authors please comment on their choice with respect to the offer pair that maximizes for the same quantity the difference pb-ps, when a deal opportunity is identified? Could the offer pair that minimizes for the same quantity the difference pb-ps be chosen instead?
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

linlan8336

金虫 (小有名气)

没人理我啊,

是不是大家也不太清楚具体的内容,不好建议哦. 这是第2次修了,要是中了一定给大家分享经验. 大家也给我提提意见吧
2楼2009-07-24 12:02:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jwfu

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
D)就回答这两句就可以了。 What happens in case qs>>qb? What happens in case quantity is a continuous variable?

F)这部分回答好一句就可以了。Could the offer pair that minimizes for the same quantity the difference pb-ps be chosen instead?
某某某,有朝一日,一定要你跪下给我添脚~~~
3楼2009-07-24 12:47:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 学术个体户 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见