24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 976  |  回复: 4
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者xmcustb将赠送您 5 个金币

xmcustb

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 审稿人意见 已有2人参与

第一次投稿,下面是审稿人意见,该怎么回复呢?求有经验的虫友各抒己见:
cat39:

REFEREE REPORT(S):
Referee: 1

COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR(S)
I have following questions:
1. This equipment is an ideal equipment which is not actually manufactured. Are you plan to produce it?
2. Authors used the material data build-in the DEFORM, which means there are no actual experiments conducted. How do you verify that the simulation results of the optimized deformation parameters are same as actual experiment and correct?
3. The material used in the paper is IN718. However, it seems that the materials can be substituted by any other materials and the process can also be conducted. Considering that no actual experiment was done, why did not authors emphatically introduce the method and just set IN718 as an application case.


Referee: 2

COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR(S)
• Number of presented results and schemes should be limited to the key ones for presented conclusions,
In the final evaluation I conclude that the reviewed article is suitable for printing in Materials Research Express
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

weownit

金虫 (正式写手)

2楼2020-10-09 01:06:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xmcustb

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by weownit at 2020-10-09 01:06:33
投的哪个期刊呀

material research express
3楼2020-10-10 11:03:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

期待成长

捐助贵宾 (知名作家)

突破自己、用心成长

【答案】应助回帖

如果实际有应用,把实际的产品列举,或者用你这个方法的论文引用作为解释;至于对于结论的支撑性说明,如果可以补实验验证最好,如果补不了的话,建议找几个同方向大牛的文章,类似方法的相同性,作为结果的支撑;整体看来,如果你解释的有理有据的话,不会太为难你的
让生活不断前进
4楼2020-10-19 11:48:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

英论阁cn

银虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

要好好根据评审意见回复,看是否采纳他们的意见。第一位审稿人是对实验设计提出问题,若认想法值得参考就好好修改,若认为他的建议超出本研究范围也要委婉地提出有力的论述回复。第二位审稿人认为你的文章值得发表,但精简results and schemes部分。
5楼2020-10-27 14:59:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xmcustb 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见