在香港召开的IEEM2009 - 会议审稿意见的交流与讨论。 - 学术会议 - 其他

版块导航: 正在加载中...

客户端APP下载

论文辅导

申博辅导

登录注册

应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

joulia

引用回帖:

Originally posted by susan5589 at 2009-7-21 16:06:
你好！这个会议正是被检索需要多长时间？由于急着毕业，迫切想知道！
IEEM09-P-0704
意见：Reviewer 1
Grade A - This paper is excellent and it should be accepted as it is.
Comment Using a case stu ...

21楼2009-07-28 18:29:07

已阅关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

longwave

22楼2009-07-28 19:19:02

已阅关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

semxuxu

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.02
金币: 3241.2
红花: 1
帖子: 1599
在线: 29.7小时
虫号: 712179
注册: 2009-03-01
性别: GG
专业: 计算机应用技术

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
visitor958(金币+5,VIP+0):还有吗？不要放长线，钓大鱼了。。。 7-29 12:30
xiaogounihao(金币+0,VIP+0): 12-13 16:27

再次放一下被拒的文章意见IEEM09-P-0048
D - This paper needs a major revision before acceptance. In particular, the authors should consider the following comments:
Comment This is a good piece of work and there seems to be quite some ideas. The topic is also interesting. However, this is not reflected in the paper.

The writing is a problem and another is the literature review. No recent international papers to refer to? Carrying out a more extensive literature search and refer to some of the discussion there. This could serve as good motivation and the research/contribution could be more convincing.

赞一下(96人)

回复此楼

23楼2009-07-29 11:19:25

已阅关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

semxuxu

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.02
金币: 3241.2
红花: 1
帖子: 1599
在线: 29.7小时
虫号: 712179
注册: 2009-03-01
性别: GG
专业: 计算机应用技术

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
visitor958(金币+10,VIP+0):谢谢分享。虽然你不是很需要，还是给满20个。 7-29 17:15
xiaogounihao(金币+2,VIP+0):谢谢分享 12-13 16:27

哈哈，最后一个被拒的文章意见IEEM09-P-0048

Paper title is not clear.
Very fuzzy abstract (e.g. "to illustrate the above problems", which are the above problems??!!)
The aim, objectives of the paper are ambiguous, not clear.
Poor descriptions, and explanations and full absence or lack of some concept definitions and mathematic formulas (Zi is used but not defined in Player section. Ai is used but not defined in section Payoff).
Conceptual mistakes and confusion in use of words
The usefulness and the research result of the paper is ambiguous
Some assumptions are not grounded adequately
Conclusions are obscure if not absent

赞一下(95人)

回复此楼

24楼2009-07-29 13:34:35

已阅关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖