有没有文章被拒的意见拿出来交流？有20金币奖励！

11楼2009-07-22 11:01:03

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

应助: 2283 (讲师)
贵宾: 0.05
金币: 17310
散金: 2544
红花: 76
帖子: 15735
在线: 2926.6小时
虫号: 489254
注册: 2008-01-01
专业: IEEE

有没有文章被拒的意见拿出来交流？有20金币奖励！

除非文章极差，一般都有明确和详细的意见，可以互相学习。

12楼2009-07-24 23:24:36

semxuxu

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.02
金币: 3241.2
红花: 1
帖子: 1599
在线: 29.7小时
虫号: 712179
注册: 2009-03-01
性别: GG
专业: 计算机应用技术

不幸有些人被拒了，真是有人拒的。

13楼2009-07-25 00:14:43

semxuxu

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.02
金币: 3241.2
红花: 1
帖子: 1599
在线: 29.7小时
虫号: 712179
注册: 2009-03-01
性别: GG
专业: 计算机应用技术

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
visitor958(金币+10,VIP+0):你也只给了一部分吧？一般都有3个审稿人的意见。。。 7-25 09:19
xiaogounihao(金币+2,VIP+0):谢谢分享 12-13 16:29

D - This paper needs a major revision before acceptance. In particular, the authors should consider the following comments:
Comment The paper is written in a bad English. There is no connection between the issue and construction project. You should present first of all what is special in tendering construction project. We can replace the word construction with opening a store or even R&D and all your paper will say valid (except the mistakes) .
In tendering the best strategy of the owner is the second high price win. There is no reference to it at all. All the English references are more that 10 years old. The assumption that each bidder's costs are subject to an independent [0,1] uniform distribution is not clear and wrong. Usually in construction the competitors knows quite well the costs and for sure it is not uniform distributed. The mathematics in section 4 (modeling ….) has many mistakes Try to be precise and use only symbols that were defined. About the example – you should explain who is paying and what do you mean self expenses to develop innovation. The example is not using anything from the model defined before

我们实验室的一篇被拒了，给出以个。

赞一下(100人)

14楼2009-07-25 00:17:58

semxuxu

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
贵宾: 0.02
金币: 3241.2
红花: 1
帖子: 1599
在线: 29.7小时
虫号: 712179
注册: 2009-03-01
性别: GG
专业: 计算机应用技术

IEEM09-P-0048 上述的文章编号

15楼2009-07-25 08:28:06

jhwang

木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 4119.9
散金: 39
红花: 1
帖子: 743
在线: 372.8小时
虫号: 275783
注册: 2006-09-02
专业: 燃烧学

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
visitor958(金币+5,VIP+0):好文章不会被拒，好好准备开会发言吧。 7-26 17:43
xiaogounihao(金币+2,VIP+0):谢谢分享 12-13 16:28

Reviewer 1
Grade A - This paper is excellent and it should be accepted as it is.
Comment Excellent paper, focused and objective.

Reviewer 2
Grade B - This is a suitable paper for this conference. Minor improvement can be done in terms of organization/language/review etc. The authors are advised to check the paper thoroughly and improve it a bit.
Details:
The authors should provide relevant literature to support that the four influencing events can be used to construct ***.

赞一下(98人)

16楼2009-07-26 15:04:43

chinanhui

17楼2009-07-26 21:49:53

bringlee

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 32801.2
红花: 1
帖子: 5967
在线: 204.5小时
虫号: 276866
注册: 2006-09-03
专业: 碳素材料与超硬材料

支持一下

18楼2009-07-26 21:53:07

lionkingxxs

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1801.3
散金: 1010
帖子: 468
在线: 112.3小时
虫号: 441755
注册: 2007-10-27
性别: GG
专业: 制造系统与自动化

大家的注册费交了没有？

19楼2009-07-28 17:17:05

lionkingxxs

银虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1801.3
散金: 1010
帖子: 468
在线: 112.3小时
虫号: 441755
注册: 2007-10-27
性别: GG
专业: 制造系统与自动化

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
visitor958(金币+5,VIP+0):你的除了语言问题，还是篇好文章。唉，想多给掉些金币给文章被拒的，好像都不好意思要。 7-28 22:14
xiaogounihao(金币+2,VIP+0):谢谢分享 12-13 16:28

IEEM09-P-1156

Reviewer 1
Grade D - This paper needs a major revision before acceptance. In particular, the authors should consider the following comments:
Comment 1. Major revision is required to improve the paper structure and its readability.
2. Language problems and confusing sentences.
Example: “Parameter transferring path complexity analysis thus convenient to make full use of customized information to design individual customization product so as to increase the rationality and efficiency of parameter valued because each parameter transferring process shows a distinct complexity characteristic of parameter information.”

Reviewer 2
Grade A - This paper is excellent and it should be accepted as it is.
Comment
Reviewer 3
Grade C - This paper can be accepted for this conference after minor revision. A couple of comments for improvement are given below:
Comment Serious formatting problem. The clarity and english usage should be improved.

赞一下(97人)

20楼2009-07-28 17:19:23