24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 896  |  回复: 11
当前主题已经存档。

mlzalft

木虫 (职业作家)

[交流] 晒晒审稿意见,欢迎指教

第一次审稿,麻烦看看审稿意见中是否有语法等问题,多谢!
注:科威特人的文章,写得很罗嗦且没有条理,创新性也不够,感觉应该拒掉,不给修改的机会了。

The manuscript describes the desulfurization process for dibenzothiophenes in an organic two-phase liquid-liquid extraction system by a combination of extraction and oxidation. Although it is necessary to desulfurize from oil, I do not recommend the publication of this paper in in a high profile journal such as Energy and Fuels based below reasons:
1.The presented NMP, DMF ACN as extractants and hydrogen peroxide and acetic/formic acid as oxidants have already been proposed by many references (such as Otsuki,Energy & Fuels 2000, 14, 1232-1239;Toteva, Fuel Processing Technology , 2009, 90,  965–970; Sampanthar, Appl. Cata. B:Environ. 2006, 63, 85-93; Matsuzawa, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, 2002, 149, 183–189; Zhao, Energy & Fuels 2007, 21, 2543-2547; Li, green chem. 2009, 11, 883-888). I therefore must say that the novelty of this manuscript is low.
2. The manuscript presented the well-known oxidative route of DBT, but there was lack of the products of DBT to support the mechnism. So the presented route is meaningless.
3. Please notice that the words in the paper should be consistent and proper. Such as, “desulfurization” and “desulphurization”. And “thiophenes” and “thiophene” should be replaced by “dibenzothiophenes”
4. It is unnecessary to use temperature programmed heating to detemine the sulfur content of single compounds. And the inject and detector temperature should be higher than oven temperature.
5. Most of the references are old and the English is not concise and need to be improved.

[ Last edited by mlzalft on 2009-7-19 at 10:27 ]
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

li21grams

金虫 (正式写手)

不错啊!楼主牛人啊!
2楼2009-07-19 10:33:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yinhuanshun

至尊木虫 (知名作家)

★ ★ ★ ★
mlzalft(金币+4,VIP+0):多谢! 7-19 11:43
1.  this paper in in a high profile 多了一个in
2. by a combination of extraction and oxidation个人感觉a是不是可以不要啊
3. and hydrogen peroxide and acetic/formic acid as oxidants 第一个and前是不是要加一个逗号?
4. The presented NMP, DMF ACN
5. And “thiophenes” and “thiophene” should be replaced by “dibenzothiophenes” 两个and在一起,不好吧

本人英文非常一般,仅供楼主参考
你可能貌不惊人,但不必耿耿于怀;你可能前途坎坷,但不必垂头丧气;欣赏自己,坚定自信,尽力走自己的路,人生就无怨无悔。
3楼2009-07-19 10:50:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家

据是要大问题,下问题不是一个级别。。。

★ ★
mlzalft(金币+2,VIP+0):多谢! 7-19 11:43
楼主据应该是根据1和2。其它就不要并列了,说是Other minor issues(无关大局)。
4楼2009-07-19 10:57:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

grubby_fan

金虫 (小有名气)

★ ★
mlzalft(金币+2,VIP+0):多谢! 7-19 11:44
based on the reasons below:
5楼2009-07-19 11:12:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperpublishing

铜虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
programmed heating to detemine the sulfur

是determine吧
RPisalwaysinbalance
6楼2009-07-19 12:31:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlzalft

木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by paperpublishing at 2009-7-19 12:31:
programmed heating to detemine the sulfur

是determine吧

哦,是的,多谢!可惜没有币币了喔!
7楼2009-07-19 12:40:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

meizhou

木虫 (知名作家)

沉墨于心,不没于物

and the English is not concise and need to be improved 表达不够地道
《memory》---BarbaraStreisand
8楼2009-07-19 16:25:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

mlzalft

木虫 (职业作家)

谢谢学友哥哦!怎么说才好?
9楼2009-07-19 16:27:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xyz18

金虫 (正式写手)

呵呵,现在也知道审稿人的特权了


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
呵呵,叹息投稿人的命运啊
10楼2009-07-19 20:25:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 mlzalft 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见