| 查看: 1762 | 回复: 9 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者amethyst356将赠送您 10 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
amethyst356木虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
Optics Express投稿求助已有6人参与
|
|
|
投Optics Express，两个审稿人，意见如下： Reviewer1: Overall a good paper that's unfortunately not giving any experimental results, but I still recommend publishing it as steeping stone for some cool applications perhaps. The writing quality can be improved by following some revision suggestions listed above. I recommend publishing it after revisions. Reviewer2:Although this work presents technically sound results, the Authors should explicitly discuss what the practical applications of this theoretical study are and they should stress the advancements of their work concerning what is already present in literature. 编辑：We regret to advise you that your manuscript has not been accepted for publication in Optics Express. The reviewer comments are included below. The Journal’s editorial board discourages resubmission of inadequately revised rejected manuscripts. Such papers may be rejected without being sent again for peer review unless the authors can show that the resubmitted paper differs significantly from the original one. 请问这种修改后重投还有希望吗？谢谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
是否上会都不知道的三无人员，翻论坛想看会评消息
已经有3人回复
-
我投稿了Elsevier，后来申请撤稿，你不允许我撤稿，强制发表然后问我要钱
已经有10人回复
-
30岁 想读非全博，求建议
已经有5人回复
-
关于论文第一通讯作者的问题？
已经有9人回复
-
第17批博士后特别资助名单
已经有5人回复
-
博士该不该读？
已经有9人回复
-
联培博士文章第一单位署名问题交流~
已经有24人回复
-
考博英语
已经有12人回复
-
基金评审时，评审专家还回去看申请人代表作之外的文章吗？
已经有18人回复
-
材料投稿速度快的二三区期刊有哪些！
已经有4人回复
bobvan
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- SEPI: 1
- 应助: 4396 (副教授)
- 金币: 31426.7
- 散金: 18010
- 红花: 324
- 帖子: 10628
- 在线: 1469.8小时
- 虫号: 2171443
- 注册: 2012-12-07
- 专业: 催化化学
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
amethyst356: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2020-08-25 11:21:00
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
amethyst356: 金币+10, ★★★很有帮助 2020-08-25 11:21:00
|
“The Journal’s editorial board discourages resubmission of inadequately revised rejected manuscripts. Such papers may be rejected without being sent again for peer review unless the authors can show that the resubmitted paper differs significantly from the original one.” 看了能否改的很彻底了 |
6楼2020-08-25 00:09:47
5