| 查看: 2288 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
gengjusha新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
返修意见看不懂，求助各位，非常急！！！！！ 已有3人参与
|
||
|
各位大神好！！！ 收到了 JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE返修邮件，其中审稿人对文章做了很多修改意见，如下列表。其中5. Results and discussion:i. Results obtained have not been thoroughly explained in line with previous study. This should be done to help show the extent of contribution to knowledge by the current study.我有点看不懂，不知道怎么回答，是不是比较一下我的工作和别人的工作，列个表在支撑文献？？？ 但是翻译出来的结果是：尚未根据先前的研究对得到的结果进行彻底的解释。应该这样做以帮助显示当前研究对知识的贡献程度。看不懂，求教各位大神 Reviewer #1: Reviewer No.1 Report. Manuscript Number: JCIS-20-4021 Title: The fabrication of layered Fe2P -Cd0.5Zn0.5S nanoparticles with a reverse heterojunction toward enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution A. General Comments. The paper looked at the development of a two-dimensional (2D) layered Fe2P modified Cd0.5Zn0.5S (CZS) nanoparticles composites through an environmentally friendly solvothermal method. The manuscript is informative and will be interesting to readers. It however, has some short comings as itemized under specific comments. The English of the manuscript is fair but requires improvement. There was no continuous line numbering in the manuscript, thereby making reading and review difficult. B. Specific Comments 1. Topic: See attached manuscript. 2. Introduction: i. The gap in literature that necessitated the study was not well captured in the introduction. This makes it difficult to appreciate the extent of work done. ii. See attached manuscript for details of other corrections 3. Keywords: Maximum of five keys is preferable. 4. Experimental: See attached manuscript for the required corrections 5. Results and discussion: i. Results obtained have not been thoroughly explained in line with previous study. This should be done to help show the extent of contribution to knowledge by the current study. ii. The other corrections are written on the attached manuscript. 6. Conclusion: See attached manuscript. 7. Acknowledgment: See attached manuscript. C. Recommendation In view of the comments above, I recommend acceptance following a major correction. Yours sincerely, |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料与化工（0856）304求B区调剂
已经有6人回复
-
265求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
一志愿天津大学材料与化工275求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
材料工程307，求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
一志愿安徽大学材料工程专硕313分，求调剂的学校
已经有7人回复
-
一志愿山东大学105500药学专硕，总分302求调剂
已经有13人回复
-
313分生物学求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
315食品工程求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
化工0817调剂
已经有7人回复
-
一志愿211，0860总分286食品工程专业求调剂
已经有8人回复
s_reg163
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 558 (博士)
- 金币: 30197.8
- 散金: 1899
- 红花: 29
- 沙发: 57
- 帖子: 20743
- 在线: 275.7小时
- 虫号: 15971895
- 注册: 2019-08-17
- 专业: 自动化
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
gengjusha: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2020-08-24 10:16:29
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
gengjusha: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2020-08-24 10:16:29
|
是不是认为你所做的研究与得出的成果，在论述中，相关的“论据”或者说“理由”还不够很充分呢？ 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
6楼2020-08-20 08:37:47
xiongzhuang
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3302.6
- 散金: 1300
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 799
- 在线: 151.6小时
- 虫号: 1035201
- 注册: 2010-06-03
- 专业: 创业与中小企业管理
2楼2020-08-19 22:46:01
3楼2020-08-19 22:47:05
4楼2020-08-19 22:49:27
