24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3602)
>导师招生 (301)
>休闲灌水 (154)
>招聘信息布告栏 (133)
>论文道贺祈福 (110)
>硕博家园 (83)
>虫友互识 (49)
>文献求助 (48)
>找工作 (42)
>考研 (41)
>生物科学 (29)
>博后之家 (26)
>考博 (22)
>基金申请 (18)
>医学 (18)
>教师之家 (14)

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

gengjusha

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 177.8
散金: 183
帖子: 59
在线: 24.8小时
虫号: 13020446
注册: 2018-11-30
专业: 化学反应工程

[求助] 返修意见看不懂，求助各位，非常急！！！！！已有3人参与

各位大神好！！！
收到了       JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE返修邮件，其中审稿人对文章做了很多修改意见，如下列表。其中5.    Results and discussion:i.    Results obtained have not been thoroughly explained in line with previous study. This should be done to help show the extent of contribution to knowledge by the current study.我有点看不懂，不知道怎么回答，是不是比较一下我的工作和别人的工作，列个表在支撑文献？？？
但是翻译出来的结果是：尚未根据先前的研究对得到的结果进行彻底的解释。应该这样做以帮助显示当前研究对知识的贡献程度。看不懂，求教各位大神
Reviewer #1:
Reviewer No.1 Report.
Manuscript Number: JCIS-20-4021
Title: The fabrication of layered Fe2P -Cd0.5Zn0.5S nanoparticles with a reverse heterojunction toward enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution

A.    General Comments.
The paper looked at the development of a two-dimensional (2D) layered Fe2P modified Cd0.5Zn0.5S (CZS) nanoparticles composites through an environmentally friendly solvothermal method. The manuscript is informative and will be interesting to readers. It however, has some short comings as itemized under specific comments. The English of the manuscript is fair but requires improvement. There was no continuous line numbering in the manuscript, thereby making reading and review difficult.

B.    Specific Comments
1.    Topic: See attached manuscript.
2.    Introduction:
i.    The gap in literature that necessitated the study was not well captured in the introduction. This makes it difficult to appreciate the extent of work done.
ii.    See attached manuscript for details of other corrections
3.    Keywords:  Maximum of five keys is preferable.
4.    Experimental: See attached manuscript for the required corrections
5.    Results and discussion:
i.    Results obtained have not been thoroughly explained in line with previous study. This should be done to help show the extent of contribution to knowledge by the current study.
ii.    The other corrections are written on the attached manuscript.
6.    Conclusion: See attached manuscript.
7.    Acknowledgment: See attached manuscript.

C.    Recommendation
In view of the comments above, I recommend acceptance following a major correction.

Yours sincerely,

回复此楼