24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4740)
>文献求助 (355)
>导师招生 (345)
>休闲灌水 (224)
>论文投稿 (214)
>虫友互识 (139)
>考博 (127)
>博后之家 (126)
>学术会议 (105)
>教师之家 (56)
>找工作 (49)
>硕博家园 (44)
>招聘信息布告栏 (42)
>公派出国 (42)
>考研 (38)
>绿色求助(高悬赏) (37)

返回列表

【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 juses9698 的 65 个金币，回帖就立即获得 1 个金币，每人有 1 次机会

juses9698

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 3362.4
帖子: 271
在线: 172.3小时
虫号: 1674749

[交流] Soils and Foundations 拒稿

Soils and Foundations 拒稿的时候编剧这么说：

Reviewers' comments:

1. General Comments to Author:
This manuscript examines the cyclic liquefaction resistance and the correction factors, Kσ and Kα, which were estimated separately based on simple shear and triaxial tests. It is a well-written manuscript on a very hot research topic of soil liquefaction and stress normalization factors of Kσ and Kα. However, the technical content needs to be substantially improved before it can be considered further. In addition, the novelty of the study reported in the manuscript in its current form is not necessarily evident. The authors should consider shortening the manuscript to focus on the novel aspects as well as clearly highlighting them and associated limitations. This means that the current manuscript has been rejected, but, the authors are encouraged to re-submit a substantially improved manuscript as a new paper for Soils and Foundations.

请问这种情况按照审稿人的意见修改，被入取的希望大不大？

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2020-07-30 14:31:05

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

一二王

新虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1524.5
帖子: 570
在线: 61.8小时
虫号: 23127827

我看错了，不好意思。

发自小木虫IOS客户端

赞一下(1人)

回复此楼

11楼2020-07-30 16:16:01

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

juses9698

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 3362.4
帖子: 271
在线: 172.3小时
虫号: 1674749

We have carefully studied comments from our reviewers concerning your paper. Although we fully appreciate the time and effort you have put into this paper, we are unable to reach a conclusion to accept the paper in its present form for publication in Soils and Foundations.

Your paper would be reviewed again as a newly submitted paper if you rewrite the paper by cosidering the following reviewer's comments to the extent satisfactory to our committee. When and if you submit a revised version of the paper, please quote the present paper number.

We sincerely hope, however, that the decision will not terminate your interest in our journal, and that we will have opportunities to be of service in the future.

Yours sincerely

Prof. Junichi Koseki
Editor in Chief
Soils and Foundations

Reviewers' comments:

1. General Comments to Author:
This manuscript examines the cyclic liquefaction resistance and the correction factors, Kσ and Kα, which were estimated separately based on simple shear and triaxial tests. It is a well-written manuscript on a very hot research topic of soil liquefaction and stress normalization factors of Kσ and Kα. However, the technical content needs to be substantially improved before it can be considered further. In addition, the novelty of the study reported in the manuscript in its current form is not necessarily evident. The authors should consider shortening the manuscript to focus on the novel aspects as well as clearly highlighting them and associated limitations. This means that the current manuscript has been rejected, but, the authors are encouraged to re-submit a substantially improved manuscript as a new paper for Soils and Foundations.

赞一下

回复此楼

3楼2020-07-30 14:36:14

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖