24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 juses9698 的 65 个金币，回帖就立即获得 1 个金币，每人有 1 次机会

juses9698

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 3362.4
帖子: 271
在线: 172.3小时
虫号: 1674749

[交流] Soils and Foundations 拒稿

Soils and Foundations 拒稿的时候编剧这么说：

Reviewers' comments:

1. General Comments to Author:
This manuscript examines the cyclic liquefaction resistance and the correction factors, Kσ and Kα, which were estimated separately based on simple shear and triaxial tests. It is a well-written manuscript on a very hot research topic of soil liquefaction and stress normalization factors of Kσ and Kα. However, the technical content needs to be substantially improved before it can be considered further. In addition, the novelty of the study reported in the manuscript in its current form is not necessarily evident. The authors should consider shortening the manuscript to focus on the novel aspects as well as clearly highlighting them and associated limitations. This means that the current manuscript has been rejected, but, the authors are encouraged to re-submit a substantially improved manuscript as a new paper for Soils and Foundations.

请问这种情况按照审稿人的意见修改，被入取的希望大不大？

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

面上可以超过30页吧？已经有7人回复
网上报道青年教师午睡中猝死、熬夜猝死的越来越多，主要哪些原因引起的？已经有5人回复
“人文社科而论，许多学术研究还没有达到民国时期的水平” 已经有6人回复
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低已经有16人回复
版面费该交吗已经有13人回复
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？已经有10人回复
什么是人一生最重要的？已经有4人回复

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

1楼 2020-07-30 14:31:05

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

一二王

新虫 (正式写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1524.5
帖子: 570
在线: 61.8小时
虫号: 23127827

我看错了，不好意思。

发自小木虫IOS客户端

赞一下(1人)

回复此楼

11楼2020-07-30 16:16:01

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

juses9698

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 3362.4
帖子: 271
在线: 172.3小时
虫号: 1674749

We have carefully studied comments from our reviewers concerning your paper. Although we fully appreciate the time and effort you have put into this paper, we are unable to reach a conclusion to accept the paper in its present form for publication in Soils and Foundations.

Your paper would be reviewed again as a newly submitted paper if you rewrite the paper by cosidering the following reviewer's comments to the extent satisfactory to our committee. When and if you submit a revised version of the paper, please quote the present paper number.

We sincerely hope, however, that the decision will not terminate your interest in our journal, and that we will have opportunities to be of service in the future.

Yours sincerely

Prof. Junichi Koseki
Editor in Chief
Soils and Foundations

Reviewers' comments:

1. General Comments to Author:
This manuscript examines the cyclic liquefaction resistance and the correction factors, Kσ and Kα, which were estimated separately based on simple shear and triaxial tests. It is a well-written manuscript on a very hot research topic of soil liquefaction and stress normalization factors of Kσ and Kα. However, the technical content needs to be substantially improved before it can be considered further. In addition, the novelty of the study reported in the manuscript in its current form is not necessarily evident. The authors should consider shortening the manuscript to focus on the novel aspects as well as clearly highlighting them and associated limitations. This means that the current manuscript has been rejected, but, the authors are encouraged to re-submit a substantially improved manuscript as a new paper for Soils and Foundations.

赞一下

回复此楼

3楼2020-07-30 14:36:14

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖