24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (3779)
>虫友互识 (650)
>文献求助 (273)
>导师招生 (192)
>休闲灌水 (140)
>论文投稿 (89)
>考博 (87)
>考研 (87)
>博后之家 (80)
>硕博家园 (79)
>基金申请 (70)
>公派出国 (54)
>教师之家 (50)
>招聘信息布告栏 (29)
>论文道贺祈福 (25)
>找工作 (20)

返回列表

加油吧tom

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 112.9
帖子: 57
在线: 13.1小时
虫号: 10290793

[交流] ijerph编辑拒稿但状态仍显示pending editor decision

本人投了ijerph期刊，第一轮给了大修完后，今天看了一下状态是Pending editor decision，但是点进去，编辑的意见是Reject and decline resubmission。

但是两位审稿人给我的意见，都认为我改的很好，一位直接同意接受发表，另一位也认为我改的比较到位，但还有一些新的问题需要修改
然后编辑直接拒稿了，还不让重投，而且他给的理由我真的无法理解。提出“The paper is haphazardly written ”的这位审稿人对我的论文其实是持积极态度的，而且他说的意见我都改了；至于数据过时的问题，如果介意这个，又何必让我辛辛苦苦修改一轮呢，第一轮直接拒掉不就好了？

不知道到底是以里面的详细信息为准，还是以首页显示的状态为准？

Decision
Reject and decline resubmission
Comments
The paper does cover some scientific ground. However, it does not in its current form add anything significant to the literature. This deficiency was identified by reviewers. The paper is haphazardly written (noted by one reviewer) and the data are quite dated, going back by almost seven years.This limits the scientific validity of the paper. I would like to thank the authors for submitting to this journal issue, but the paper cannot be considered further.

回复此楼