24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

日不知夜黑

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 58.6
散金: 431
帖子: 167
在线: 56.6小时
虫号: 22525042
注册: 2020-06-01
专业: 粒子物理学和场论

[交流] iScience悲剧：not a bad news though!已有13人参与

如题。

审稿才2个星期多一点，真心快。虽然拒了，身经百战的老板却说应该庆祝一下：“that is not bad at all, actually this is what i am expecting. ”... "come on, xxxx, this is a cell press journal after all, not as easy as you think"

看了审稿意见，虽然提问较多，看得出审稿人还是很谨慎，没让我们做无厘头的实验。加上导师的鼓励，信心倍增！

由于是拒稿，就不发金币了。

dear xxxx,

thank you for submission of your paper to iscience. i have now included the comments that reviewers made on your paper, which i hope you will find useful and constructive. as you will see, the overall view is that the study is potentially interesting, but the recommendation is against publication of the paper in iscience and we have therefore closed the submission.

that said, the reviewers do make suggestions for further experiments and analyses that might guide the paper toward being a stronger candidate for the journal. if you are interested in pursuing further consideration of this work at iscience, you would first need to submit a point-by-point response that outlines how you might be able to address the reviewer concerns, and outlines how any corresponding results and/or edits would be incorporated into a revised manuscript. we would then assess the plan for revision, possibly in consultation with the reviewers. based on these considerations, we would either reactivate the manuscript file to enable resubmission, or reiterate our decision to reject the paper.

also, we recently updated our reviewer questionnaire to help reviewers and authors get the most out of the peer review process. we would appreciate your feedback. please visit the survey here.

i know that this outcome is disappointing, given the hard work that you and your colleagues have put into the paper. i hope that the reviewers' comments will be useful to you as you consider next steps, and i hope that you will consider iscience for future submissions as your interesting work progresses.

sincerely,

xxxxx

xxxx xxxxx, ph.d.
scientific editor, iscience

reviewers' comments
reviewer's responses to questions

....

经过近三个星期的苦战，终于取得新的实验数据完美回答审稿人的意见。牛鼻子老板信心满满，我们决定向iscience第二次冲击！

我向老板报告，iscience只有4.47分，人家根本不care：“it is a cell press journal; there is only one cell press in the world; impact factor is nothing under the name of cell” (最后一句话没听清楚，大概就是这个意思)

[ last edited by 日不知夜黑 on 2020-7-20 at 00:11 ]

老板又苦心修改了10天，重写了几大段，论文已经再投iscience，希望这次是个好结果！

该好好度个假了，去哪儿呢？florida的beach是去不成了，las vegas好像也不太平。国内很好玩可惜去不了，唉。。。

anyway, keep my fingers crossed!

[ last edited by 日不知夜黑 on 2020-7-30 at 13:57 ]

更新一下。论文7月29日重投后8月2日再次送审，应该是回到了以前的审稿人。希望好运

[ last edited by 日不知夜黑 on 2020-8-6 at 16:58 ]

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

小修！审稿半个月后返回，编辑给的是小修，非常开心！！！

审稿人还是以前的那些，又给了很多细节上的意见，大多对论文提升大有帮助。有一些意见改不改无所谓，但对大局无影响还是按照意见改了吧。可以看得出审稿人很谨慎，避免让我增加新的实验（因为考虑到我大手术一次了）。

等正式接收后，一定散金币祝福大家！

最后祝大家旗开得胜，马到成功！

[ Last edited by 日不知夜黑 on 2020-8-14 at 14:17 ]

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

科研经验

就业

» 猜你喜欢

Bioresource Technology期刊，第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了已经有7人回复
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果已经有4人回复
真诚求助：手里的省社科项目结项要求主持人一篇中文核心，有什么渠道能发核心吗已经有8人回复
寻求一种能扛住强氧化性腐蚀性的容器密封件已经有5人回复
论文投稿，期刊推荐已经有6人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。已经有4人回复
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷已经有14人回复
请问下大家为什么这个铃木偶联几乎不反应呢已经有5人回复
请问有评职称，把科研教学业绩算分排序的高校吗已经有5人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入已经有4人回复

1楼2020-06-28 23:15:43

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

日不知夜黑

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 58.6
散金: 431
帖子: 167
在线: 56.6小时
虫号: 22525042
注册: 2020-06-01
专业: 粒子物理学和场论

引用回帖:

7楼: Originally posted by 陆小凤2013 at 2020-06-29 09:55:51
这建议就是拒稿重提，看楼主如何考虑了，这种情况发生无非两种原因，一种是纯粹的不适合，另一种可能是最近优质稿件太多导致楼主被放入候选区（stronger candidate for the journal），因为编辑先夸了你有趣和有意义 ...

谢谢！PNAS对于我们组没有意义，PRL我们的文章太长，不合适。我会和老板再讨论一下。

看来确实稿源太多了。我们这么好的论文竟然没有给major revision.