| 查看: 2763 | 回复: 9 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
zengflgx铜虫 (著名写手)
|
[交流]
怎么写Responses to Technical Check Results
|
||
|
前几天本人在《Journal of Alloys and Compounds》杂志上投了一篇文章，但是后来编辑给我回邮件要求我提供“Responses to Technical Check Results”，但是这个编辑并没有将我这篇论文出现的技术问题给我列出来，因此我不知道该怎么写这个'Responses to Technical Check Results'，也就是说我根本不知道什么是‘Responses to Technical Check Results'。请问论坛内有哪位高人曾经遇到过类似情况，请帮忙指点一下小弟，本人初次投稿，甚是无知。 以下是该杂志编辑发给我的邮件，请过目： Dear professor Fan, Your resubmitted article entitled "Densification behavior of W-Ni-Fe nanocomposite powder prepared by sol-spray drying and hydrogen reduction process" has been received by Journal of Alloys and Compounds. However, before we can proceed, we ask you to provide your 'Responses to Technical Check Results'. Please upload your "Responses" sheet under the submission item 'Responses to Technical Check Results' and submit it together with your manuscript. A sample of the sheet can be found at: http://www.elsevierscitech.com/l ... echnical_Check.pdf. We regret that without a completed "Responses" sheet, your manuscript will not be further processed. Thank you for submitting your work to the journal, and if you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Yours sincerely, Senthil AmmaiyalSubbaiah Journal Manager Journal of Alloys and Compounds |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
拟解决的关键科学问题还要不要写
已经有11人回复
-
救命帖
已经有5人回复
-
限项规定
已经有5人回复
-
为什么nbs上溴 没有产物点出现呢
已经有9人回复
-
招博士
已经有3人回复
-
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗
已经有35人回复
-
最失望的一年
已经有18人回复
-
求推荐博导
已经有4人回复
-
求推荐英文EI期刊
已经有5人回复
-
疑惑？
已经有5人回复
5楼2009-07-11 16:37:49
metapost868
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 247.5
- 帖子: 79
- 在线: 6.3小时
- 虫号: 516593
- 注册: 2008-03-03
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 超导电工学
2楼2009-07-11 10:27:52
liyongv
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 5 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 9448.8
- 散金: 1590
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 1355
- 在线: 989.2小时
- 虫号: 424680
- 注册: 2007-07-22
- 专业: 表面、形态与形貌分析
3楼2009-07-11 13:11:11
hjh8093
铁杆木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6185.1
- 散金: 90
- 帖子: 798
- 在线: 243.9小时
- 虫号: 684981
- 注册: 2008-12-30
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
|
Dear Editor, Thank you for your useful comments and suggestions on the language and structure of our manuscript. We have modified the manuscript accordingly, and detailed corrections are listed below point by point: 1) In its current state, the level of English throughout your manuscript does not meet the journal's required standard. Authors have the responsibility to present their papers in good English which can be understood by the journal's readership without difficulty. We have revised the WHOLE manuscript carefully and tried to avoid any grammar or syntax error. In addition, we have asked several colleagues who are skilled authors of English language papers to check the English. We believe that the language is now acceptable for the review process. 2) Please note that your abstract (250 words) has exceeded the maximum length of 150 words for research articles in this journal. The abstract has been revised and its word count is now 149. The manuscript has been resubmitted to your journal. We look forward to your positive response. 照这个模扳写 |
4楼2009-07-11 15:54:46