24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

onlymindyou

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 7188.1
红花: 1
帖子: 1186
在线: 234.1小时
虫号: 1644760
注册: 2012-02-26
专业: 化学动力学

[交流] IEEE期刊投稿求助已有1人参与

请教各位一个投稿ieee transactions on signal processing期刊的问题，之前投稿另一个ieee的期刊被拒，现在投这个杂志，投稿系统有这么一个选项
is this manuscript a re-submission or modified version of a previously rejected manuscript? (please note that this question refers to previous submission to any journal, not just to this journal or other ieee journals.) if you answer "yes", specify the journal and manuscript id of the previous submission and upload a response to the previous review. please read the ieee signal processing society policy 6.16 "handling of rejected papers" before resubmitting the manuscript.

是说无论我之前投了哪个期刊，都需要把期刊名字和稿号标上？即便我上一次据我的期刊不是ieee的也要这么做？还要提交一个“a response to the previous review”？这个回复是什么意思？对上一次被拒我的回复？另外也把他上边提到的 ieee signal processing society policy 6.16 "handling of rejected papers"粘在下边供各位参考，谢谢大家！

6.16. handling of rejected papers. (approved 11 november 2009)

authors of rejected manuscripts are allowed to resubmit their manuscripts afresh only once. at the time of submission, authors will be asked whether they consider their manuscript to be a new submission or a resubmission of an earlier rejected manuscript. if the authors indicate that their manuscript is a new submission, then the review process will follow the regular procedure.

if authors indicate instead that their manuscript is a resubmission, then they are required to upload a supporting document detailing how the new submission has addressed the concerns raised during the previous review. authors may also request that the resubmission be handled by the same associate editor, if the associate editor has not retired from the board. the editor-in-chief will do his/her best effort to accommodate the author’s request while taking into consideration the balancing of the workload among the associate editors of the editorial board of the journal. a new associate editor may also be assigned to the manuscript by the editor-in-chief.

even when the manuscript is flagged by the authors to be a resubmission of an earlier rejected paper, the manuscript will be treated as a new submission with a new submission date; it is not treated as an rq version.

the assigned associate editor can use the previous reviewers or a new set of reviewers, or a mix of old and new reviewers. it is preferable that the associate editors use some of the previous reviewers to help ascertain that the revision has addressed the concerns of the earlier review cycle. the selection of the reviewers is left to the discretion of the associate editor.

if the authors indicated during the submission process that their manuscript is a new submission and it is found during the review process that the manuscript is very similar to an earlier rejected paper, then the manuscript may be immediately rejected. authors can still resubmit their manuscript and indicate correctly that it is a resubmission of an earlier rejected manuscript, including uploading of the required supporting document detailing how the new submission has addressed the concerns raised during the previous review.

回复此楼