24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 877  |  回复: 5
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

0328310121

[交流] 恳请大家帮我看看major revise 意见

小妹第一次投稿外文期刊 lElsvier 旗下的 image and vesion computing,历时六个月,收到编辑的回信如下:感觉第一个reviewer意见比较肯定,但是第二个reviewer
好像并不太支持,让重新翻译后resubmit,编辑给定的状态是 major revise,恳请各位前辈指教一下,这样被accept 的机会能有多少?我需要如何做呢?先谢过了。

We have received reports from the Referees who were asked to review your manuscript.  Please find the relevant parts of each review attached to this email.

If you decide to submit a revised version of your manuscript, we would ask you to provide a written statement of the way you have taken account of the referee comments in preparing the revision.  You may include the text of this statement at the beginning of the manuscript text when you submit the revised manuscript.  (It can be separated at a later stage).  

We will return the revised manuscript to the reviewers for further comment and we may send the manuscript to additional reviewers before reaching a final decision about publication. Please submit your revision by the Sep 04, 2009.

For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.

To submit a revision, go to http://ees.elsevier.com/imavis/ and log in as an Author.  You will see a menu item call Submission Needing Revision.  You will find your submission record there.

Yours sincerely

Maja Pantic, PhD
Editor in Chief
Image and Vision Computing




Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: * The paper presents a new approach for lane identification based on an quadratic parabola model and the ant colony algorithm.

In my opinion the contents is interesting, but the presentation should really be improved in order to increase readability.

* English really needs to be improved (some parts can hardly be understood)
  - also use common terms (e.g. pretreatment -> preprocessing), ...

Detailed comments to the contents:

* p.7: "lower filter ist applied..." -> lowpass filter

* p.9, eq. (9) & (10):
  - For me, it is not obvious how the objective function F(a,b,c) depends on a and c. Please explain.
  - Parameters  and  depend on image and environmental conditions and are chosen by experiments. Please try to present all these results in a more compact/uniform way (table?) and derive final results on p.11 from it (-> table?)
  
* p.12, sec.4: "The ant colony algorithm posed by Dorigo" => add reference [M. Dorigo: optmization, Learning, and Natural Algorithms, PhD thesis, Policenico di Milano, Italie, 1992.]

* p.12, sec.4: Please add a structogram to illustrate the overall algorithm.

* p.13: How did you choose a1, b1 and c1 in eq. (11) for the first image (initial ROI)? Please explain.

* p.16, sec. 5: You just mention results in fig. 12-15. For how many images / image sequences did you test your method? Did it always work? What are the limits?

* p.17, sec. 6: What do you mean be "excellent real-time"? Please mention hardware used, image size and frames per second.




Reviewer #2: Please check the English and re-submit for review.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wordadobe

铜虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
excellent real-time,这种夸张的修饰词最好少用

审稿意见不算多
软件驱动生产力
4楼2009-07-07 17:56:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 6 个回答

haojigong

木虫 (正式写手)

好好修改,希望蛮大的,
就看楼主怎么回答好第二个审稿人的意见了,
2楼2009-07-07 17:25:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

brian125

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
第一次投外文,都会被人说英语不好,那就找个专业相近的大牛,把他相关的文章全下下来,一句一句的模仿吧。

编辑既然给了大改的意见,应该还是很有希望的,当然要认认真真的按照意见改,还有就是要是不急的话,最好等到时间过了2/3之后再投修改稿,这样一方面自己可以多看一遍,另一方面也是给编辑一个我仔细修改了的印象。
3楼2009-07-07 17:30:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

0328310121

引用回帖:
Originally posted by haojigong at 2009-7-7 17:25:
好好修改,希望蛮大的,
就看楼主怎么回答好第二个审稿人的意见了,

谢谢二楼的回答,这也是我正头疼的事,不太好回答啊
5楼2009-07-07 18:05:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见