24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 907  |  回复: 14
当前主题已经存档。

wph1021

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 收到这样的审稿意见,还有希望吗?请帮忙看下。谢谢

今天收到了自己3个月前投稿英国的一篇文章的审稿意见(如下),请大家帮我看看,这样还有希望吗?大家多提点意见和建议。非常感谢!
Dear Author,

Your manuscript entitled "Highly-sensitive nanofiber sensor for measuring ambient refractive index" which you submitted to Journal of Modern Optics, has been reviewed. The reviewer comments are included at the bottom of this letter.

You will see that although the referees find some merit in the paper it is required that substantial revisions be done before we can consider it further.  Nevertheless, we do hope that you will be able to undertake the additional work on the paper and look forward to receiving a revised manuscript in due course.

When you revise your manuscript please highlight the changes you make in the manuscript by using the track changes mode in MS Word or by using bold or coloured text.

To submit the revision, log into http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tmop  and enter your Author Centre, where you will find your manuscript title listed under "Manuscripts with Decisions." Under "Actions," click on "Create a Revision." Your manuscript number has been appended to denote a revision. Please enter your responses to the comments made by the reviewers in the space provided. You can use this space to document any changes you made to the original manuscript. Please be as specific as possible in your response to the reviewers.

IMPORTANT:  Your original files are available to you when you upload your revised manuscript.  Please delete any redundant files before completing the submission.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to Journal of Modern Optics, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible.  If it is not possible for you to submit your revision within four months, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission.

Once again, thank you for submitting your manuscript to Journal of Modern Optics and I look forward to receiving your revision.

Yours sincerely,
Professor Jonathan Marangos
Editor in Chief, Journal of Modern Optics
j.marangos@imperial.ac.uk


Reviewer Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
Q1> At Page, lines 20-25, authors insist that there is no research on the refractive index sensor using nanofibers. However, there are many recent reports on this issue. It is required to differentiate the manuscript from other publications.

1. F.Xu, G.Brambilla, "Demontration of a refractometric sensor based on optical microfiber resonator," Applied Physics Letters 2008 Vol.92 pp.101126.

2. F.Xu, V.Pruneri, V.Finazzi, G.Brambilla, "An embedded optical nanowire loop resonator refractometric sensor," Optics Express 2008 Vol.16(2) pp.1062-1066

3. F.Xu, P.Horak, G.Brambilla, "Optical microfiber coil resonator refractometric sensor,"
Optics Express 2007 Vol.15(12) pp.7888-7893.

4. Xin Guo, Limin Tong, "Supported microfiber loops for optical sensing," Opt. Exp. 15, 14429 (2008).

5. Lei Shi, Yonghao Xu, Wei Tan and Xianfeng Chen,"Simulation of optical microfiber loop resonators for ambient refractive index sensing," Sensors 7, 689 (2007).

Q2> Author analytically simulated the nanofiber MZI for refractive index sensors. Reviewer recommend to include the word "simulated" and "Mach-Zehnder" because there are many previous publications using different scheme.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

keen

至尊木虫 (职业作家)


jackiemwd(金币+1,VIP+0):3ks 7-4 19:45
认真修改就是了
2楼2009-07-03 21:23:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhaocy8903

木虫 (知名作家)

太有希望了
3楼2009-07-03 21:25:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xueyongzhou

银虫 (小有名气)

有希望
学习!学习!!再学习!!!
4楼2009-07-03 21:56:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lroy

银虫 (小有名气)

very you xiwang
5楼2009-07-04 01:22:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wph1021

木虫 (正式写手)

谢谢大家的关注和意见 我抓紧时间修改 希望能如大家所愿 呵呵 一起加油:-)
6楼2009-07-04 15:54:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jingxufeng

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
很有希望,不过看了审稿意见感觉楼主你对所研究领域的文献调研不够啊!
7楼2009-07-04 19:11:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wph1021

木虫 (正式写手)

恩,有句话表达不严谨,呵呵 被审稿人见笑了:-) 谢谢大家指导
8楼2009-07-04 21:03:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

buchwald

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

还好吧,认真修改,通过可能极高,因为至少从编辑角度上看,他们是支持你的
9楼2009-07-04 21:09:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

guohuazhong

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

呵呵,还是对你研究的领域调研得不够。
10楼2009-07-05 00:23:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wph1021 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见