| ²é¿´: 526 | »Ø¸´: 3 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
ashen8212ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÎÄÕ±»¾Ü£¬20½ð±ÒÇóÉê±çÐÅÄ£°å
|
||
| rt ²»Ê¤¸Ð¼¤ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
»¯¹¤¾©Çø271Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
295Çóµ÷¼Á¡£Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±¨¿¼Ö£ÖÝ´óѧ»¯Ñ§¹¤ÒÕѧ˶£¬×Ü·Ö295·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
²ÄÁÏ284Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ö£ÖÝ´óѧӢһÊý¶þר˶
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
0856»¯¹¤×¨Ë¶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ15È˻ظ´
303Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
289Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
½ËÕʡũ¿ÆÔºÕе÷¼Á1Ãû
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
290·Ö²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì085601Çóµ÷¼Á Êý¶þÓ¢Ò»
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
0856µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´

hxwin
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
´óÏÀ~
- Ó¦Öú: 17 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1578
- É¢½ð: 1886
- ºì»¨: 12
- Ìû×Ó: 915
- ÔÚÏß: 440.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 251471
- ×¢²á: 2006-05-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ·ÂÉú²ÄÁÏ
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
cxksama(½ð±Ò+5,VIP+0):¸Ðл°ïÖú£¬°ïÂ¥Ö÷´ú·¢BB¸øÄã¡£µ«ÊÇÓй涨£¬Õë¶ÔͬһIDÔÚÒ»ÌûÖÐ×î¶àÖ»ÄÜ·¢5¸ö¡£ 7-2 15:42
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
cxksama(½ð±Ò+5,VIP+0):¸Ðл°ïÖú£¬°ïÂ¥Ö÷´ú·¢BB¸øÄã¡£µ«ÊÇÓй涨£¬Õë¶ÔͬһIDÔÚÒ»ÌûÖÐ×î¶àÖ»ÄÜ·¢5¸ö¡£ 7-2 15:42
|
¿´Õâ¸öÄܹ©Äã²Î¿¼²»£º Dear ******, First of all, I would like to thank you most profoundly for making yourself available for direct contact. I have always found the one-way anonymity and long delays of the review process a great hindrance to meaningful communication with my reviewers. I have now received a response from Nature, including your own commentary. I am however disappointed in your recommendation for rejection unless substantial new material is added. The other reviewer was less kind, suggesting unconditional rejection. I enclose the full review from Nature in case you would like to see it. There was generally good correspondence between the two reviews on the major points, with which the editor was also in agreement. The general conclusion was that I have tackled an important and very interesting issue and that my approach has novelty and may have promise. However the complaint was raised that I have not developed my approach beyond the metaphor stage, and that therefore no real theory is presented. Furthermore, it was said that I failed to cite alternative approaches such as Grossberg's ART model, the PDP approach, and Gibson's resonance theory. The editor concludes that addressing these comments will require a lot of work, especially developing a theory of perception. General Response ****Äã×Ô¼ºµÄÄÚÈÝ ×£Äã¸ßÖУº£© [ Last edited by hxwin on 2009-7-1 at 21:39 ] |

2Â¥2009-07-01 21:38:25
ashen8212
ľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 23 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 3016.7
- É¢½ð: 4957
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 1871
- ÔÚÏß: 366.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 602581
- ×¢²á: 2008-09-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÎÛȾ¿ØÖÆ»¯Ñ§
cxksama(½ð±Ò+0,VIP+0):Ï´μǵÃ×Ô¼ºÉèÖÃŶ£¬Õâ»Ø°ïÄã·¢ºÃÁË¡£µ«ÊÇÂÛ̳¹æ¶¨×î¶àÖ»ÄÜÕë¶ÔÒ»¸öID·¢5¸ö£¬ËùÒÔÎÒÖ»ÄÜ·¢5¸ö¸øËû¡£ 7-2 15:40
|
Âé·³°æÖ÷°ïÎÒ¿Û20bb¸øÂ¥ÉϵÄÅóÓÑ°É ×òÌì¿ÉÄÜ´ÒæÍü¼ÇÉèÁË |

3Â¥2009-07-02 08:26:10
hxwin
ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
´óÏÀ~
- Ó¦Öú: 17 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 1578
- É¢½ð: 1886
- ºì»¨: 12
- Ìû×Ó: 915
- ÔÚÏß: 440.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 251471
- ×¢²á: 2006-05-14
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ·ÂÉú²ÄÁÏ

4Â¥2009-07-02 16:12:34













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
5