24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

ashen8212

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 23 (小学生)
金币: 3016.7
散金: 4957
红花: 5
帖子: 1871
在线: 366.5小时
虫号: 602581
注册: 2008-09-14
性别: GG
专业: 污染控制化学

[交流] 文章被拒，20金币求申辩信模板

rt 不胜感激

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

西南交通大学国家级人才团队2026年博士研究生招生（考核制）—机械、材料、力学方向已经有3人回复
救命帖已经有6人回复
存款400万可以在学校里躺平吗已经有37人回复
英文综述是否需要润色及查重已经有5人回复
限项规定已经有5人回复
为什么nbs上溴没有产物点出现呢已经有9人回复
招博士已经有3人回复
最失望的一年已经有18人回复

试了不一定行，不试一定不行

1楼 2009-07-01 21:24:26

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

hxwin

木虫 (正式写手)

大侠~

应助: 17 (小学生)
金币: 1578
散金: 1886
红花: 12
帖子: 915
在线: 440.2小时
虫号: 251471
注册: 2006-05-14
性别: GG
专业: 仿生材料

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包，谢谢回帖交流
cxksama(金币+5,VIP+0):感谢帮助，帮楼主代发BB给你。但是有规定，针对同一ID在一帖中最多只能发5个。 7-2 15:42

看这个能供你参考不：

Dear ******,

First of all, I would like to thank you most profoundly for making yourself available for direct contact. I have always found the one-way anonymity and long delays of the review process a great hindrance to meaningful communication with my reviewers. I have now received a response from Nature, including your own commentary. I am however disappointed in your recommendation for rejection unless substantial new material is added. The other reviewer was less kind, suggesting unconditional rejection. I enclose the full review from Nature in case you would like to see it.

There was generally good correspondence between the two reviews on the major points, with which the editor was also in agreement. The general conclusion was that I have tackled an important and very interesting issue and that my approach has novelty and may have promise. However the complaint was raised that I have not developed my approach beyond the metaphor stage, and that therefore no real theory is presented. Furthermore, it was said that I failed to cite alternative approaches such as Grossberg's ART model, the PDP approach, and Gibson's resonance theory. The editor concludes that addressing these comments will require a lot of work, especially developing a theory of perception.

General Response
****你自己的内容

祝你高中：）

[ Last edited by hxwin on 2009-7-1 at 21:39 ]