| ²é¿´: 447 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õß°ÙÊ¿ɷ¢½«ÔùËÍÄú 20 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
°ÙÊ¿ɷ¢½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇëÎÊÁ×Ëá¸ú»òÕß¾ÛÁ×Ëá¸ùÄܲ»ÄÜÎü¸½ÔÚ¸ßÁëʯ±íÃæµÄAlλ
|
|
|
¸÷λ³æÓÑ£¬ÎÒÊÕµ½ÁËÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÓÐÒ»¸öÎÊÌâΪ£º Results on table 1 are random and difficult to understand ?! we should expect a stronger leaching effect by using higher concentrated solutions (?) and the opposite tendency when the material is calcined at higher temperature ? Why the random variation here observed ??? ʵÑé½á¹ûÊÇÕâÑùµÄ£ºÁ×ËáŨ¶ÈºÜ¸ß£¬¸ßÁëʯÔÚ6MºÍ14MµÄÁ×Ëá½þ³öµÄAlŨ¶È´óÓÚ10MµÄ¡£ ÎÒÏëÓþÛÁ×Ëá»áÎü¸½ÔÚ¿óÎï±íÃæµÄÂÁÉÏ£¬×è°ÁËAlµÄÈܽ⣿ÇëÎÊÁ×Ëá¸ú»òÕß¾ÛÁ×Ëá¸ùÓÐûÓпÉÄÜÎü¸½ÔÚ¸ßÁëʯ±íÃæµÄAlλ£¿ ![]() |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
323·Ö£¨¼ÆËã»úÊÓ¾õºÍ´óÄ£ÐÍÏîÄ¿£©ÄÜÖ±½ÓÉÏÊÖ
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¸´ÊÔµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
311·Ö 22408 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
320·ÖÈ˹¤ÖÇÄܵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ö£´ó0705Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
0703»¯Ñ§
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
301Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
306·Ö²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
324Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
°ÙÊ¿ɷ¢
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1100.7
- É¢½ð: 661
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 353
- ÔÚÏß: 71.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2673516
- ×¢²á: 2013-09-23
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÆäËûÎÞ»ú·Ç½ðÊô²ÄÁÏ
2Â¥2020-03-26 10:39:14















»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥