| ²é¿´: 487 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õß°ÙÊ¿ɷ¢½«ÔùËÍÄú 20 ¸ö½ð±Ò | ||
°ÙÊ¿ɷ¢½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÇëÎÊÁ×Ëá¸ú»òÕß¾ÛÁ×Ëá¸ùÄܲ»ÄÜÎü¸½ÔÚ¸ßÁëʯ±íÃæµÄAlλ
|
|
|
¸÷λ³æÓÑ£¬ÎÒÊÕµ½ÁËÉó¸åÒâ¼û£¬ÓÐÒ»¸öÎÊÌâΪ£º Results on table 1 are random and difficult to understand ?! we should expect a stronger leaching effect by using higher concentrated solutions (?) and the opposite tendency when the material is calcined at higher temperature ? Why the random variation here observed ??? ʵÑé½á¹ûÊÇÕâÑùµÄ£ºÁ×ËáŨ¶ÈºÜ¸ß£¬¸ßÁëʯÔÚ6MºÍ14MµÄÁ×Ëá½þ³öµÄAlŨ¶È´óÓÚ10MµÄ¡£ ÎÒÏëÓþÛÁ×Ëá»áÎü¸½ÔÚ¿óÎï±íÃæµÄÂÁÉÏ£¬×è°ÁËAlµÄÈܽ⣿ÇëÎÊÁ×Ëá¸ú»òÕß¾ÛÁ×Ëá¸ùÓÐûÓпÉÄÜÎü¸½ÔÚ¸ßÁëʯ±íÃæµÄAlλ£¿ ![]() |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÄÜ·ñÍ˳ö²ÎÓëµÄÃæÉÏÏîÄ¿½â³ýÏÞÏî
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
ûÓÐÈκÎÏûÏ¢-ÊDz»ÊǾÍÁ¹ÁË
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
½¨Òé»ù½ð·¢²¼Ìáǰ¸ø³öÃ÷È·µÄʱ¼äµã
ÒѾÓÐ16È˻ظ´
Èç¹û´Ë¿ÌÄãÕýÔÚΪ¹ú»ù¸Ðµ½½¹ÂÇ£¬²»·ÁÀ´ÌýÌýÕâÊס¶»ù½ðÖ®Íâ¡·
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
½ñÈÕ²»·Å°ñ£¿Íø´«¹ú×ÔȻԤ¼Æ 8 Ô 27 Èտɲé½á¹û
ÒѾÓÐ21È˻ظ´
¹À¼ÆÊÇÖÜËÄ
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÎÒÃæÉÏÍêµ°ÁË
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
2026¹ú×ÔÈ»º¯ÆÀ·Ñµ½ÕË
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
·¶½øÖоÙÒ»ÎĵÄÖÐÐÄ˼Ïë
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
ÅóÓÑȦ¿´µ½µÄ
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
°ÙÊ¿ɷ¢
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1100.7
- É¢½ð: 661
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 353
- ÔÚÏß: 71.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2673516
- ×¢²á: 2013-09-23
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÆäËûÎÞ»ú·Ç½ðÊô²ÄÁÏ
2Â¥2020-03-26 10:39:14










»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
20