24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2038  |  回复: 15
当前主题已经存档。

starcraft

金虫 (著名写手)

[交流] Phys rev lett要提高标准了,更没有机会啦

今天收到APS编辑部的一封信,说PRL要提高标准了,诸位有意的虫友要注意了,内容如下:
Dear Dr. Dong ,

We at Physical Review Letters always look for ways to do better at our core mission, which is to provide the physics community with accounts of crucial research in a convenient format. PRL at present publishes about 80 Letters per week, and we Editors, and many readers of PRL, have concluded that these cannot all discuss crucial research, and that it is too large a number to be convenient. This view is also held by our editorial board and by others, as we know from a wide range of exchanges with our colleagues.

As a result we will reaffirm the standards for acceptance for PRL. The criteria will not change fundamentally, but we will work to apply them with increased rigor. To meet the PRL criteria of importance and broad interest, a Letter must

1) substantially advance a particular field; or

2) open a significant new area of research; or

3) solve a critical outstanding problem, or make a significant step toward solving such a problem; or

4) be of great general interest, based, for example, on scientific aesthetics.

We are confident that this initiative will lead to a journal that is better able to attract the best papers, because it will provide a more exclusive platform for those papers, and thus impart a higher profile to the most significant results. We also anticipate that a renewed focus on the characteristics that underlie importance and broad interest, as listed above, will lead to a more accurate selection process. As we reinvigorate the PRL criteria, we will also make every effort to make decisions promptly. This will enable results to reach the community in a timely fashion, whether in PRL or in a more suitable venue.

For this effort to be successful, authors must submit only results that meet at least one of the above criteria. Referees must judge breadth of interest based on impact both in the specific field and across field boundaries, and must support favorable recommendations with substantive reasons to publish. Editors will be more discriminating in both their own evaluation of manuscripts and their interpretation of referee reports. In support of these efforts we will revise our statement of Policies and Practices and our Referee Response Form.

We will carefully monitor the impact that application of reaffirmed standards has on the physics community. The process will necessarily be gradual, as authors, referees, Editors, and Divisional Associate Editors become familiar with more rigorous application of PRL requirements. This will also allow time to correct for any unexpected deleterious effects. Although we do not plan a specific numerical target, we do wish to make a significant change in the number of papers we publish.

We note that there are many papers that are valid and important in their area, but are not at the level of importance or broad interest that is necessary for PRL. There are also papers of great importance for their field and/or of broad interest that simply cannot be presented in a letter format. The Physical Review journals have high standards and unmatched reputations and are natural venues for such papers.

We know that these changes will lead to some disappointments. We are convinced, however, that a more selective PRL will communicate the best physics more efficiently.

Sincerely,
The Editors

Please see our Editorial: Improving PRL
回复此楼
你说你要汽车要洋房,而我却只有一张破破烂烂,吱吱嘎嘎直响的床!俺的主页,没事来瞧瞧:http://course.zjnu.cn/autocad/
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hongafeir

银虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
这样好啊,不然很多量子信息的垃圾文章都能在上面撑门面啊
相信努力!
2楼2009-06-30 10:50:30
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hanwu

木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
作为物理界的顶级期刊,所报道的内容必须是非常具有代表性的才能体现出水平。
3楼2009-06-30 10:55:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fengyun6658

金虫 (小有名气)

这样很好。
4楼2009-06-30 11:01:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

snack

木虫 (著名写手)

好就一个字。
5楼2009-06-30 11:11:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hjh8093

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
这样也好!我们能下些好文章看看!
6楼2009-06-30 11:52:10
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
7楼2009-06-30 11:58:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

baoyanl

金虫 (知名作家)

★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
SHY31(金币+1,VIP+0):谢谢交流 6-30 12:19
这几年PRL上的文章确实有灌水的嫌疑。去年好像就说了要减一半的文章
8楼2009-06-30 11:59:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dawnlight

荣誉版主 (职业作家)

小木虫小小版主


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
同意二楼,一个事实是量子信息、Graphene占据PRL的10%以上。
姿曰:年轻会结束,在结束以前,把想做的事做完吧!
9楼2009-06-30 21:30:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kangzhen_y

金虫 (著名写手)

嗯 好消息 呵呵
10楼2009-06-30 22:52:34
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 starcraft 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 关于filecode,很负责任的告诉大家 +6 爱看书的可乐 2026-08-08 7/350 2026-08-08 22:13 by a_niu
[基金申请] 国基金的申报应该改成非等额制,评价高的钱多评价低的钱少,但是增加资助率 +7 a089 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-08 18:05 by gltch
[基金申请] 好奇怪的filecode +3 布布和一二 2026-08-08 4/200 2026-08-08 17:46 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 qTvzQBRAHjCi 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-08 17:02 by oEVWOejN9taj
[考博] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急 +3 Vi50GxzrFcSG 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-08 16:27 by oEVWOejN9taj
[考博] 售一区SCI文章T0P,我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急 +3 Vi50GxzrFcSG 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-08 16:22 by oEVWOejN9taj
[公派出国] 售SCI一区T0P文章,我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急 +3 Vi50GxzrFcSG 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-08 15:59 by oEVWOejN9taj
[基金申请] 这样的filecode谁见过 +5 布布和一二 2026-08-08 8/400 2026-08-08 14:54 by archvillain
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +4 HEQlVqMTIA7d 2026-08-07 6/300 2026-08-08 14:47 by oEVWOejN9taj
[公派出国] 售SCI文章,我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 HEQlVqMTIA7d 2026-08-07 6/300 2026-08-08 14:39 by oEVWOejN9taj
[基金申请] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 HEQlVqMTIA7d 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-08 14:27 by oEVWOejN9taj
[教师之家] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 KXLV3nuBVBY7 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-08 14:07 by oEVWOejN9taj
[论文投稿] 售SCI文章,我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急 +3 KXLV3nuBVBY7 2026-08-07 6/300 2026-08-08 14:01 by oEVWOejN9taj
[考博] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 HEQlVqMTIA7d 2026-08-07 3/150 2026-08-08 03:47 by 6vVgjDL4CnGu
[基金申请] 基金中了 +14 laoda193707 2026-08-06 14/700 2026-08-08 00:23 by 实验小白ha
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 化学口download_prp&fileCode的固定段好像这几天一直没变,有变的大神么? +3 Tide man 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-07 22:39 by Tide man
[基金申请] 固定端突然变了,今天 +6 archvillain 2026-08-06 10/500 2026-08-07 16:03 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 听说今天filecode变了 +24 布布和一二 2026-08-06 47/2350 2026-08-07 16:02 by zhiyanjiang
[基金申请] filecode变化情况 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-07 22/1100 2026-08-07 14:45 by 且听虎啸
信息提示
请填处理意见