24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3193  |  回复: 7
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者CRHUSTSEEE将赠送您 8 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

CRHUSTSEEE

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] MPCE Decision Letter副主编意见 "some revisions"是要大修吗? 已有4人参与

2019年9月23号投稿一篇MPCE,一审三个月,副主编Decision letter里面给出的意见是“The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some revisions to your manuscript.  Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.”,这个“some revisions”是大修的意思还是小修的意思呢? 如果是小修的话,投稿系统里面的Decision status给的又是大修(Major revision);但要是大修的话,为什么Decision letter里面不直接说Major revision而用some revisions呢?是副主编在Decision letter里笔误了吗?
       Decision letter附下,求各位大神指导这篇文章还有没有发表希望


        以下是Decision letter
  
25-Dec-2019

Manuscript ID MPCE-2019-0048  which you submitted to the Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, has been reviewed.  The comments of the reviewer(s) are included at the bottom of this letter.

The reviewer(s) have recommended publication, but also suggest some revisions to your manuscript.  Therefore, I invite you to respond to the reviewer(s)' comments and revise your manuscript.

Because we are trying to facilitate timely publication of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, your revised manuscript should be uploaded as soon as possible.  If it is not possible for you to submit your revision in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your paper as a new submission.

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
The paper is well written and the subject is meaningful to the power system community.

However, as the paper deals with the fault calculation and location in distribution systems, and as the paper is submitted to the Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, distribution energy resources (DERs) need to be considered.

At least, the authors should mention DERs, provide the state-of-the-art in fault calculation with DERs, and explain how would they include DER models for fault calculations into their method.

Some of the literature in this area in the MPCE journal, as well as in other world-class academic journals are as follows:

1. STREZOSKI, L.V., VOJNOVIC, N.R., STREZOSKI, V.C. et al. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-018-0494-1
2. WENG, J., LIU, D., LUO, N. et al. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy (2015) 3: 494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-015-0166-3
3. L. V. Strezoski and M. D. Prica, "Short-circuit analysis in large-scale distribution systems with high penetration of distributed generators," in IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 243-251, April 2017.
doi: 10.1109/JAS.2017.7510517



Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
1. Section II.A, what does multiresolution mean?
2. The symbol l_{fD_i} in section II.C not well defined, what does it mean?
3. Is the Kp-based fault point determination method requiring selecting several candidate fault points first? Why not use least square method on (2) and (4) to estimate the fault location directly?
4. Table II shows that the fault inception time is much larger than the travelling time of waves, which implies that a minor fluctuation of fault inception time on the detectors will significantly affect the detection accuracy. Thus the method requires very high-accuracy characterization and very stable performance of the detectors. Can the authors comment on this?
5. How will the transformers in the distribution network affect the travelling waves and the proposed method?
6. The travelling waves will have reflections on heterogeneous interfaces. How will this phenomenon affect the method?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

易智编译

禁虫 (正式写手)

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
本帖内容被屏蔽

4楼2019-12-26 15:35:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

songcumt

至尊木虫 (职业作家)


【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
CRHUSTSEEE(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2019-12-26 15:11:48
按照投稿系统里面的Decision status的状态为准,编辑说的修改涵盖大修或小修,不必在意他是Major revision还是some revisions
2楼2019-12-25 16:33:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bobvan

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
CRHUSTSEEE(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2019-12-26 15:11:43
您有这时间好好按审稿意见修改就是了,管它大修小修呢。再说,小修不一定代表百分百接收,大修也不说明接收概率低。我去年帮朋友投的稿,有三篇是拒稿重投后接收的。总之,编辑给了你机会,你要抓住,认真对待每条审稿意见,好好回复及修改文章。
3楼2019-12-26 02:47:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

flyingair007

银虫 (正式写手)

好好修改吧,别管是大修还是小修,尽你最大努力去修
5楼2019-12-29 23:00:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见