24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (2189)
>虫友互识 (87)
>公派出国 (43)
>导师招生 (33)
>休闲灌水 (30)
>论文投稿 (28)
>基金申请 (24)
>考博 (24)
>硕博家园 (22)
>找工作 (18)
>教师之家 (16)
>文献求助 (16)
>考研 (13)
>论文道贺祈福 (11)
>博后之家 (8)
>专业外语 (7)

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者liuwendao将赠送您 20 个金币

liuwendao

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 115
散金: 76
红花: 1
帖子: 111
在线: 13.4小时
虫号: 7410027
注册: 2017-11-01
性别: GG
专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域

[求助] 审稿者到底想知道什么

初稿投过去的某条意见评论：

A discussion on the convection parameters between the fluid and the liner as a function of pressure and speed should be added. The lack of knowledge of these parameters must be significant, therefore it would be necessary to evaluate a probable scale of variation of this parameter and then to numerically quantify its impact on the spatial and temporal field in the tank. It is not possible to eliminate this analysis of data misunderstanding in the context of this article where the predictive character of the model is sought. No analysis is made on the wall speeds for the different configurations. It is an essential indicator for heat transfer between gas and solid.

修改稿一投过去的该条意见评论：
I ask again the question: What is the consequence of this lack of knowledge on the result? I am not asking for a parametric study but to assess the risks of variability due to a lack of knowledge of the properties. I would like to remind you that the purpose of the paper is to quantify the temperature fields to identify risks in terms of materials. Either the authors quantify the difference by different calculations or they discuss the lack of knowledge.

这个人到底到底想问什么？首先我说一下，这是国际氢能杂志投稿，然后方向是快充，我和导师琢磨了好久都不知道这个审稿者的这条意见是什么意思?有大神看懂了可以分享一下自己的见解吗？

回复此楼