| 查看: 518 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 木腐真菌 的 40 个金币 | |||
[交流]
请问大家,编辑的审稿意见怎么样?值得修稿后重投吗?
|
|||
|
Your manuscript was reviewed by several experts in the field; and we are enclosing the comments they have made. As you can see, the reviewers think that the work is of potential interest; however, significant concerns have also been voiced, which would preclude publication of the paper in its present form. We are however able to consider a revised version of the manuscript providing that you satisfy the criticisms raised in the attached comments by the reviewers and/or the Editors. Please be aware that we are not sure if a revised version will positively be evaluation for publication. Should you decide to re-submit, please include a cover letter and a point-by-point response to the referees' and Editors' comments. All comments need to be addressed; and if you do not agree with some of them, please specify the reason(s). 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
» 猜你喜欢
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有19人回复
职称评审没过,求安慰
已经有53人回复
毕业后当辅导员了,天天各种学生超烦
已经有5人回复
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
2楼2019-11-27 08:52:26
james-james
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 633 (博士)
- 金币: 39498.3
- 红花: 117
- 沙发: 17
- 帖子: 28236
- 在线: 2473.9小时
- 虫号: 1446532
- 注册: 2011-10-17
- 专业: 药物化学
3楼2019-11-27 08:57:59

4楼2019-11-27 09:28:15













回复此楼