| 查看: 2404 | 回复: 12 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Major revision and reconsideration有希望吗?
|
|||
|
投《Food Chemistry》三个审稿人，第一个基本是拒稿：Reading this manuscript a feeling is born that the authors sufficiently describe the pre-existing knowledge in the article rather than their findings of this work. Thus there are too many superfluous sentences in the manuscript.This work lacks originality. These facts weaken the merit of this paper.In summary, I think the presentation of this paper is not up to the standard of the journal. The manuscript contains grammar mistakes, so it should be proof read by an expert in English language before submitting again. 第二个审稿人 I think the manuscript is suitable for publicaction after including minor changes. So I suggest the publication of the paper in FOOD CHEMISTRY. 第三个审稿人This method provides a valuable alternative for the ----- 编辑给的是Major revision and reconsideration，象这样有希望吗？请各位虫有介绍点经验，谢谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
基金中了
已经有15人回复
-
帮忙看看fileCode
已经有8人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有3人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有15人回复
-
filecode
已经有8人回复
-
确定了，国自然21号放榜
已经有7人回复
-
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分？
已经有11人回复
-
关于代码变化问题，想知道的进来
已经有24人回复
-
为什么网上很多人说本周 12号出结果
已经有3人回复
-
静等基金结果
已经有16人回复
9楼2009-06-07 18:27:07
haojigong
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3887.8
- 散金: 110
- 帖子: 560
- 在线: 29.3小时
- 虫号: 586824
- 注册: 2008-08-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能陶瓷
2楼2009-06-07 11:29:01
woshilaoer8381
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 12156.7
- 红花: 4
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 6131
- 在线: 525.9小时
- 虫号: 583714
- 注册: 2008-08-01
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
3楼2009-06-07 11:36:27
4楼2009-06-07 11:41:23
100