| 查看: 2411 | 回复: 12 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Major revision and reconsideration有希望吗?
|
|||
|
投《Food Chemistry》三个审稿人，第一个基本是拒稿：Reading this manuscript a feeling is born that the authors sufficiently describe the pre-existing knowledge in the article rather than their findings of this work. Thus there are too many superfluous sentences in the manuscript.This work lacks originality. These facts weaken the merit of this paper.In summary, I think the presentation of this paper is not up to the standard of the journal. The manuscript contains grammar mistakes, so it should be proof read by an expert in English language before submitting again. 第二个审稿人 I think the manuscript is suitable for publicaction after including minor changes. So I suggest the publication of the paper in FOOD CHEMISTRY. 第三个审稿人This method provides a valuable alternative for the ----- 编辑给的是Major revision and reconsideration，象这样有希望吗？请各位虫有介绍点经验，谢谢！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
不应该看fileCode
已经有6人回复
-
2019年青年基金涵评意见，大家看看几个A，几个B?
已经有7人回复
-
好奇怪的filecode
已经有6人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有21人回复
-
长年满屏的广告，版主太不责任了。基金也等的急
已经有4人回复
-
filecode
已经有15人回复
-
关于Filecode分析方法
已经有4人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有35人回复
-
职称评审，求友友推荐见刊最快的期刊
已经有4人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有10人回复
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
8楼2009-06-07 17:14:15
haojigong
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3887.8
- 散金: 110
- 帖子: 560
- 在线: 29.3小时
- 虫号: 586824
- 注册: 2008-08-15
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能陶瓷
2楼2009-06-07 11:29:01
woshilaoer8381
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 12156.7
- 红花: 4
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 6131
- 在线: 525.9小时
- 虫号: 583714
- 注册: 2008-08-01
- 专业: 凝聚态物性 II ：电子结构
3楼2009-06-07 11:36:27
4楼2009-06-07 11:41:23
