| 查看: 1063 | 回复: 12 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
请前辈们指点迷津，我该怎么办
|
|||
|
论文需要大修，具体意见如下： We now have referees' comments on the above paper. I am pleased to tell you that the work is of interest, but regret to say that the paper is not considered suitable in its present form for publication in Ironmaking and Steelmaking: Processes, Products and Applications. The reasons are detailed in the comments below. You will see that a number of general and specific points are mentioned which necessitate extensive rewriting of the paper. Please consider how you wish to proceed. If you are able to revise the paper extensively, to deal in full with all the points mentioned, we shall be willing to consider the position further. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
静等基金结果
已经有18人回复
-
澳大利亚 Murdoch University 全奖博士招生（3个名额）地质化工冶金领域
已经有14人回复
-
阿姨
已经有3人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有6人回复
-
filecode
已经有16人回复
-
重要来源：本周末出结果
已经有10人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有11人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有6人回复
-
不应该看fileCode
已经有9人回复
-
Filecode 又变了，巨变
已经有4人回复
大侠们，这段是什么意思
| When resubmitting, please provide a list of changes and, where appropriate, respond to each point which has been raised by the reviewers. These comments must be uploaded as a separate file during the resubmission process, together with text and high resolution figure files prepared in the manner specified in the instructions to authors. Failure to do this may result in a delay in the typesetting of your paper. Please note that it is not permitted to submit a PDF file of the revised manuscript at this stage. |
5楼2009-06-07 09:54:00
2楼2009-06-07 09:41:28
buchwald
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 26 (小学生)
- 金币: 7060.5
- 散金: 2726
- 红花: 6
- 帖子: 4373
- 在线: 789.8小时
- 虫号: 736828
- 注册: 2009-04-01
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 有机合成
3楼2009-06-07 09:44:41
4楼2009-06-07 09:44:57
