| 查看: 1070 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者zeyer将赠送您 8 个金币 | ||
[求助]
投美陶关于编辑的审稿意见求助 已有1人参与
|
||
|
Associate Editor Comments to Author: 各位大佬们，我今年投了一篇美陶，经历了大概一个半月的审稿之后大修，有三个审稿人，两个小修一个大修，其中两个人分别提了不下10条意见，还有一个编辑的意见，编辑给出的部分意见如下。 现在有一个问题想求助大家，因为我这个论文之前投别的期刊被拒，已经经过了语言润色了还上传了润色证明。但是编辑回复中还是有提到poor written，审稿人们倒没有说语言问题。这句话是套话吗，这种情况下改完以后还需要再次润色吗？ 诚心求助，先感谢各位了！ The authors present their results on the synthesis of V2O3/C by solution combustion method and its characteristics and performance as an anode for Li ion batteries. The authors present a different way of making such material and show that their V2O3/C material, that is amorphous, has superior performance than any reported before. The work is noteworthy, however the manuscript is very poorly written and needs a major re-write before it can be accepted by the journal. I list below some of my concerns in addition to the ones raised by the reviewers: 1)All the issues raised by the reviewers must be addressed and corrected. 2)It is not clear how many samples…… ………… 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有15人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有18人回复
-
建议基金发布提前给出明确的时间点
已经有15人回复
-
范进中举一文的中心思想
已经有7人回复
-
朋友圈看到的
已经有9人回复
-
让我中一个面上吧！
已经有16人回复
-
放榜前的不淡定
已经有17人回复
-
科研孤儿太难了
已经有19人回复
-
明天应该可查了！？
已经有4人回复
-
什么时候开奖？
已经有11人回复
2楼2019-10-10 20:00:07
