| 查看: 648 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者wbs199589将赠送您 6 个金币 | ||
wbs199589新虫 (初入文坛)
|
[求助]
Part G 投稿被拒推荐转投其他刊物Transfer求助
|
|
|
Peer review in process 状态持续16天后进入Decision阶段，果然悲剧。文章是做“细胞化航天器在轨组装时装配结构的优化”，相当于一体化卫星的舱布局优化工作。PART G是出了名的委婉。。。拒稿都让人看起来都挺舒服的，让人不知道问题到底在哪里。以下是拒稿信中删掉了废话剩下的，求高手帮着看看，有以下几个问题： 1）：“will not be further considered for publication”是一票否决吗？还有没有和编辑商量继续在PART G上重新投稿的必要； 2）：我找了一下，PART D-JOURNAL OF AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING好像录用率在95%，同样也是1个月返回给一审消息，有前辈投过此刊物吗？，与本文主题是否符合 3）：推荐的开源刊物“Advances in Mechanical Engineering”AME中与本文主题是否符合，很好中吗？ 小硕第一次写文章，但急求毕业，望不吝赐教。谢谢~~金币不多，还望谅解 拒稿信正文： It is with regret that I have to inform you that your article has been denied publication in Journal of Aerospace Engineering. Journal of Aerospace Engineering considers the scope and novelty of manuscripts before peer review, and it was agreed by the Editorial Team that your manuscript may be a better fit for another SAGE journal. See the associate editor's comments below. The Editor has therefore recommended that your manuscript is considered for publication in Advances in Mechanical Engineering. Sincerely, Dr. Anton de Ruiter Editor in Chief, Journal of Aerospace Engineering aderuiter@ryerson.ca Associate editor comments: After careful consideration, we regret to inform that your manuscript will not be further considered for publication. Although the interest and the practical applicability of the research is not questioned (on the contrary, it seems an interesting and effective technical solution), the innovations proposed in this manuscript seem only incremental compared to the methods within the already existing literature. Hence, regardless of the actual quality and effectiveness of the proposed solution, the novelty presented in this paper is considered to be somewhat limited in this sense. （创新程度有限） Furthermore, and despite the topicality of cellular reconfigurable spacecraft, in view of the presented bibliography it is difficult to support a clear interest of the community in the topic. In this regard, it has been noted that: 1) a great many of the references are conjunctural and merely background reading, but do not really address the research topic investigated in the manuscript nor contribute to depict the actual state of the art; 2) many of these bibliographic entries actually belong to journals in robotics, computer science and various fields other than aerospace; and 3) many of the references (actually almost half of them) are conference proceedings that do not seem to have make it into a journal publications, which sheds some doubts on their technical quality or relevance to the aerospace community. All this considered, it is unclear whether the contributions of this manuscript are sufficiently relevant to the community within the broader readership of our journal. （参考文献选择不好） Please, note that the quality of the work is not being judged, but our journal is embracing the commitment to accept only papers that make a substantial or meaningful contribution to areas of high interest for the aerospace community, and in this regard, we don't find that this paper presents a strong case. （估计没送审就被主编拒了） However, we consider the research to be of interest, and therefore recommend the manuscript to be transferred to Advances in Mechanics Engineering, where the topic might fit well, unless the authors should prefer to resubmit to a different journal that they consider more suitable. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
081700，311，求调剂
已经有18人回复
-
081700学硕，323分，一志愿中国海洋大学求调剂学校
已经有17人回复
-
085600材料与化工301分求调剂院校
已经有21人回复
-
化工学硕 285求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
0703调剂
已经有18人回复
-
0702物理学学硕299求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
304求调剂（085602，过四级，一志愿985）
已经有19人回复
-
085600材料与化工专硕329 求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
生物与医药273求调剂
已经有10人回复
