| 查看: 1063 | 回复: 7 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
zhangdi137金虫 (小有名气)
|
[交流]
今天JAC大修之后给了回复消息 已有2人参与
|
||
|
今天JAC大修之后给了回复消息，大四毕设实验发的文章，人生第一篇sci。有很多细节都没有注意到，第一次让大修竟然是因为自己写的太烂。参考文献也是自己手动敲的。 希望以后还是多注重细节吧，可能以后会因为细节直接拒稿，不会给机会了。 感恩自己吧，本来可以安安逸逸地做毕设，然后毕业。自己折腾自己非要发篇文章试试。中间一度想放弃，因为基本肯定不会有结果，没想到去坎坎坷坷走到了这里。 最要感谢的还是世界上最好的导师和我的师姐，感恩。  发自小木虫Android客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有19人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有53人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有5人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
zenglw1983
至尊木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 6 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 21143.1
- 散金: 255
- 红花: 14
- 帖子: 3059
- 在线: 1370.3小时
- 虫号: 445185
- 注册: 2007-10-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
5楼2019-08-12 15:48:19
zhangdi137
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 666.1
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 247
- 在线: 52.1小时
- 虫号: 8262860
- 注册: 2018-03-14
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
2楼2019-08-12 10:47:07
zhangdi137
金虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 666.1
- 散金: 10
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 247
- 在线: 52.1小时
- 虫号: 8262860
- 注册: 2018-03-14
- 专业: 工程热物理相关交叉领域
|
Reviewer #1: The revised manuscript is now in a good shape for publication. Only a minor issue remained. (1) Q5 of Reviewer#1: The authors did not address the question. How did NiO which was photoactive in UV region promote the visible photoactivity for Fe2O3/NiO? Reviewer #2: In this version, authors have improved the quality of the manuscript, and answered the corresponding questions, even there are some mistakes or unclear statements in these answers. From the point of view of science, the revised manuscript can be published in "Journal of Alloys and Compounds". The authors should avoid the simple mistakes in their further scientific works. For example: Regarding question 1: The authors mentioned "We have revised this part in the manuscript on Page12." I could not find the revised one on Page12. Actually, it is on Page 14 and 15. Regarding question 1: The authors provided a totally wrong Figure corresponding to the under illustrations they want to show. 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
3楼2019-08-12 10:48:52
|
恭喜恭喜 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
4楼2019-08-12 12:43:48